메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이영석 (광주대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第230輯
발행연도
2016.6
수록면
205 - 238 (34page)
DOI
10.16912/tkhr.2016.6.230.205

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Great Fire of London in 1666 is well-known to us. At that time the most area of the City was burnt and collapsed by the fire. But it is also true that the Great Fire was served as a turning point at which London began to be changed from medieval city to modern one. How had London been redeveloped and re-built after the fire? How could contemporaries who initiated the redevelopment of London overcome some conflicts and estrangements between their ideal for modern city and residents’ realistic interests? After depicting the whole precess of the Great Fire on the basis of two contemporaries’ diaries, this essay focuses on examining the above problems.
Of course, the ideal of modern city that some contemporaries such as John Evelyn, Christopher Wren and Robert Hooke had sought, was deformed and distorted in the process of redevelopment of the city. Their original plans were strongly influenced by residents’ interests and the city authorities’ realistic necessity. For all that, a generation later, London grew as one of the most prosperous cities in Europe. Destruction is sometimes followed by new construction. The economic prosperity of London in the end of the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century was helped upon its half-successful result of redevelopment after the fire.

목차

Ⅰ. ‘대화재’의 트라우마
Ⅱ. 일기로 보는 ‘대화재’
Ⅲ. 유언비어와 묵시록적 환상
Ⅳ. 사회불안과 당국의 대처
Ⅴ. 도시 재개발
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-905-000853379