지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.8
- 수록면
- 45 - 62 (18page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This case was to assess the efficiency of 26 technology appraisal centers(TAC) of Korea Technology Finance Corporation(KOTEC) and improve the efficiency. The research is based on the analysis of data collected from 2011 to 2013 with Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA). As the number of employees and business administrative expenses were used as input variables, leveraging the number of technology appraisal cases, the amount of technology credit guarantee provision and the amount of debt collection through exercising indemnity rights as well as revenues accruing from the technology appraisals were used as output variables. The purpose of those variables are aimed at representing the differentiated features of KOTEC from other conventional credit guarantee institutions.
The analysis result showed that the efficiencies of TACs were high overall and improving in the way that their efficiency values show mostly over 0.9 on average. CCR model showed that the number of effective DMUs –represented as Technology Efficiency(TE) Value was 1 – was 7 in 2011 and 13 in 2013 while BCC model showed that the number of DMUs, whose values of Pure Technology Efficiency(PTE) was 1, was 15 in 2011 and 17 in 2013 respectively. The number of DMUs, whose value of Scale Efficiency(SE) is 1, had also been increased from 7 in 2011 to 13 in 2013.
The number of DMUs was to show the status of “Constant Returns to Scale(CRS)” increased from 7 in 2011 to 13 in 2013. The number of DMUs was to show the status of “Increasing Returns to Scale(IRS)” was 16 in 2011 and 11 in 2013. The number on “Decreasing Returns to Scale(DRS)” had decreased from 3 in 2011 to 2 in 2013 respectively. Therefore, the number of efficient DMUs whose input was proportional to output –signaling the optimal efficient status- increased by 6. The number of DMUs which still had inefficiency and needed to step up the input had been decreased by 4 while the number of DMU which need to be scaled back the input is decreased by 1. Overall, efficiency of TACs has been increased. The result implies there are many DMUs which could increase the size efficiency, not through removing the inefficiencies by decreasing the input, but through scaling up the total size of output, leveraged by the consolidation of the internal analogous operation in order to make a synergy effect as well as the reduction of outsourcing tasks which have been related with claim collection process and hiring external technology appraisal experts.
The benchmarked DMUs which could be the reference group were An-san, Sa-Sang and Sung-Nam TACs. They were located near to the industry complexes. So, their geographical conditions were well positioned to access to the technology-innovative corporations and venture startups, solidifying the fundamental to provide supply in accordance with the increasing demand of technology finance.
The value of this study was that it analyses the efficiency of KOTEC takes the key role of technology financing based on technology appraisal. This research was distinctive in that it defined the input and output variables to measure the efficiency of credit guarantee institutions while earlier studies, most of which researched credit-evaluation based guarantee institutions, did not deal with those variables. It has implications which could be applied to evaluate the efficiency of public technology appraisal institution in the future.
The analysis result showed that the efficiencies of TACs were high overall and improving in the way that their efficiency values show mostly over 0.9 on average. CCR model showed that the number of effective DMUs –represented as Technology Efficiency(TE) Value was 1 – was 7 in 2011 and 13 in 2013 while BCC model showed that the number of DMUs, whose values of Pure Technology Efficiency(PTE) was 1, was 15 in 2011 and 17 in 2013 respectively. The number of DMUs, whose value of Scale Efficiency(SE) is 1, had also been increased from 7 in 2011 to 13 in 2013.
The number of DMUs was to show the status of “Constant Returns to Scale(CRS)” increased from 7 in 2011 to 13 in 2013. The number of DMUs was to show the status of “Increasing Returns to Scale(IRS)” was 16 in 2011 and 11 in 2013. The number on “Decreasing Returns to Scale(DRS)” had decreased from 3 in 2011 to 2 in 2013 respectively. Therefore, the number of efficient DMUs whose input was proportional to output –signaling the optimal efficient status- increased by 6. The number of DMUs which still had inefficiency and needed to step up the input had been decreased by 4 while the number of DMU which need to be scaled back the input is decreased by 1. Overall, efficiency of TACs has been increased. The result implies there are many DMUs which could increase the size efficiency, not through removing the inefficiencies by decreasing the input, but through scaling up the total size of output, leveraged by the consolidation of the internal analogous operation in order to make a synergy effect as well as the reduction of outsourcing tasks which have been related with claim collection process and hiring external technology appraisal experts.
The benchmarked DMUs which could be the reference group were An-san, Sa-Sang and Sung-Nam TACs. They were located near to the industry complexes. So, their geographical conditions were well positioned to access to the technology-innovative corporations and venture startups, solidifying the fundamental to provide supply in accordance with the increasing demand of technology finance.
The value of this study was that it analyses the efficiency of KOTEC takes the key role of technology financing based on technology appraisal. This research was distinctive in that it defined the input and output variables to measure the efficiency of credit guarantee institutions while earlier studies, most of which researched credit-evaluation based guarantee institutions, did not deal with those variables. It has implications which could be applied to evaluate the efficiency of public technology appraisal institution in the future.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 기술금융과 기술보증기금
Ⅳ. 연구방법
Ⅴ. 연구결과
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
DEA 모형을 이용한 김치제조업체의 효율성 평가
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
-
서비스무역으로서의 외국인 이용 관광호텔의 효율성 분석
무역학회지
2015 .08
-
비모수 프런티어 접근을 통한 ICT 효율성 분석 연구
한국IT서비스학회지
2017 .01
-
DEA모형을 통한 감정평가법인의 효율성 분석
주택도시연구
2017 .04
-
경영효율성 분석을 위한 메타-프론티어법 이용에 관한실증적 연구
무역연구
2018 .01
-
유해산출물을 고려한 대학 효율성 분석
경영컨설팅연구
2017 .01
-
SBM모형에 의한 신용협동조합의 효율성 분석
경영연구
2015 .01
-
공영도매시장에서의 농협공판장의 효율성 분석
무역연구
2016 .01
-
공공기관의 유형별 효율성 평가와 비효율성 원인의 규명에 관한 연구
한국경영과학회지
2015 .02
-
DEA를 활용한 충북지역 생활폐기물 수집․운반 관리 운영에 관한 효율성 분석
한국비교정부학보
2024 .06
-
자료포락분석에서 극단값에 따른 민감도 분석 - 공기업 효율성 평가를 중심으로 -
한국정책학회보
2015 .01
-
식품기업의 경영효율성 제고방안에 관한 연구
유통경영학회지
2021 .10
-
자료포락분석을 이용한 중국⦁한국⦁글로벌 소매유통업체 경영효율성 분석
유통과학연구
2018 .01
-
다 기간 성과평가를 위한 Super Efficiency DEA 모델 및 사례적용
서비스 연구
2025 .03
-
지역사회 시니어클럽 특성별 상대적 효율성 분석
지역사회연구
2017 .09
-
기술금융 평가지표의 판별유의성에 관한 실증연구 : 기술보증기금의 기술사업성 평가지표를 중심으로
벤처창업연구
2020 .10
-
수산식품 가공업의 효율성 분석
수산경영론집
2015 .01
-
농업기술 도입기업과 미도입기업의 효율성 분석 연구 - 농촌진흥청 개발 떡 제조기술을 중심으로 -
농업경영.정책연구
2021 .12
-
외식 소상공인의 운영효율성 측정과 효율성 변동요인에 대한 분석: 희망리턴 패키지 지원 대상 외식업체를 대상으로
유통경영학회지
2024 .10
-
기술거래플랫폼 서비스 개선방안에 대한 연구
아태비즈니스연구
2022 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
중소기업 혁신 촉진을 위한 기술금융 지원 확대 방안 : 기술보증기금의 지식서비스산업 지원제도 개선을 중심으로
이재필
,
김민수
대한산업공학회 춘계공동학술대회 논문집
2014
.05
창업기업의 기술금융 활성화방안
조석홍
대한경영학회지
2017
.02
기술사업화 활성화를 위한 기술금융-기술가치평가 연계 방안에 관한 연구
최산
,
정재연
,
성태응
외 1명
한국기술혁신학회 학술대회
2016
.05
혁신형 중소기업 기술금융 지원사업의 적절성에 대한 실증연구
성웅현
기술혁신학회지
2013
.03
신용보험 원리를 적용한 신용보증제도의 효율성 확대 방안
윤상용
기업과혁신연구
2017
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-323-001147354