지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.4
- 수록면
- 1 - 147 (147page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Seoul Trail Project spans across 157km in eight different courses costing approximately 12.4 billion won from 2009 to 2014. The identity of the Seoul Trail can be defined as an urban scenic trail that is a ‘forest path for rest and relaxation that can be enjoyed with a purpose (completion, learning, healing)’.
This study proposed management and operation plans with the completion of the Seoul Trail. Surveys were held for users of the Seoul Trail 4 and 5 course and examined the course suitability/facility arrangement to propose improvement plans and composed a management and consigned operation plan for administration through the two-tracked method of management and operation, while suggesting a road map. Furthermore, this study reflected regionality to the Seoul Trail for specialization and suggested contents to promote its usage.
First, based on the user survey, it was found that there many elderly over 50 years of age residing near the Seoul Trail, they used it for the goal of health and healing, and the user satisfaction was for the most part high. Users wanted it to operate programs related to health, healing, leisure and relaxation, and for facilities, wanted installation of rest rooms and emergency facilities, and expressed the intent to complete the courses once its construction is finished.
Second, for the appropriateness of the Seoul Trail course, its courses are long and required fragmentation, and at the fragmenting location, stamps are installed so that it can be linked to the transportation system. In addition, for the facilities of Seoul Trail, on-site studies of courses 4 and 5 courses were conducted and analyzed to identify the facility concentration and management status.
Third, for the management and operation of the Seoul Trail, while being in the direction for the dualized system of management and operation, a gradual dualization will be pursued by year. For management, it is overseen by the city of Seoul and for each course, they are managed by the respective local government and park and greenification office, while the operation is consigned by course by organizing a HUB organization (tentatively called the Seoul Trail Network) that can oversee the operation of Seoul Trail. Furthermore, the ‘Seoul-road Team’ that is in charge of the Seoul Dodream-Road and a variety of other paths of Seoul shall be installed under the Seoul Green City to comprehensively manage the HUB organization.
Fourth, specialization plans, contents development, PR and civil participation plans to promote the use of the Seoul Trail were proposed. By implementing the urban forest healing program at the Seoul Trail, it shall be operated in conjunction with the ‘Let’s Exercise, Seoul’ program, while finding historical and cultural story-telling themes for each Seoul Trail course, finding ‘art spots’ for installation arts, concerts and lectures, while promoting ecological specialization spots by linking up with regions with excellent eco-systems.
This study proposed management and operation plans with the completion of the Seoul Trail. Surveys were held for users of the Seoul Trail 4 and 5 course and examined the course suitability/facility arrangement to propose improvement plans and composed a management and consigned operation plan for administration through the two-tracked method of management and operation, while suggesting a road map. Furthermore, this study reflected regionality to the Seoul Trail for specialization and suggested contents to promote its usage.
First, based on the user survey, it was found that there many elderly over 50 years of age residing near the Seoul Trail, they used it for the goal of health and healing, and the user satisfaction was for the most part high. Users wanted it to operate programs related to health, healing, leisure and relaxation, and for facilities, wanted installation of rest rooms and emergency facilities, and expressed the intent to complete the courses once its construction is finished.
Second, for the appropriateness of the Seoul Trail course, its courses are long and required fragmentation, and at the fragmenting location, stamps are installed so that it can be linked to the transportation system. In addition, for the facilities of Seoul Trail, on-site studies of courses 4 and 5 courses were conducted and analyzed to identify the facility concentration and management status.
Third, for the management and operation of the Seoul Trail, while being in the direction for the dualized system of management and operation, a gradual dualization will be pursued by year. For management, it is overseen by the city of Seoul and for each course, they are managed by the respective local government and park and greenification office, while the operation is consigned by course by organizing a HUB organization (tentatively called the Seoul Trail Network) that can oversee the operation of Seoul Trail. Furthermore, the ‘Seoul-road Team’ that is in charge of the Seoul Dodream-Road and a variety of other paths of Seoul shall be installed under the Seoul Green City to comprehensively manage the HUB organization.
Fourth, specialization plans, contents development, PR and civil participation plans to promote the use of the Seoul Trail were proposed. By implementing the urban forest healing program at the Seoul Trail, it shall be operated in conjunction with the ‘Let’s Exercise, Seoul’ program, while finding historical and cultural story-telling themes for each Seoul Trail course, finding ‘art spots’ for installation arts, concerts and lectures, while promoting ecological specialization spots by linking up with regions with excellent eco-systems.
목차
[표지]
[요약 및 정책건의]
1. 연구의 개요
2. 주요 연구결과
3. 개선방안 및 정책건의
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[I. 연구의 개요]
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 연구의 내용 및 방법
[II. 국내외 주요 탐방로 조사 분석]
1. 국외사례
2. 국내사례
3. 시사점
[III. 서울둘레길 이용시민 설문조사]
1. 설문조사 개요
2. 설문조사 결과 분석
3. 소결
[IV. 서울둘레길 코스 및 시설 개선방안]
1. 서울둘레길 조성현황
2. 코스 현황 및 개선방안
3. 코스별 시설·훼손 현황 및 개선방안
[V. 서울둘레길 관리·운영 방안]
1. 관리·운영 현황
2. 관리·운영 방안
[VI. 서울둘레길 시민이용 활성화 방안]
1. 서울둘레길 특성화 방안
2. 서울둘레길 콘텐츠 운영
3. 서울둘레길 홍보 및 시민참여 방안
[VII. 요약 및 정책건의]
1. 결과요약
2. 정책건의
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
[Table of Contents]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
스토리텔링 기법에 의한 농촌마을 걷는 길 조성에 관한 연구 : 여주시 도리마을을 중심으로
도지윤
,
서주환
,
여화선
Journal of Integrated Design Research
2016
.06
환경친화적 숲길의 조성과 관리를 위한 정책 제안
최정석
한국지역개발학회지
2014
.06
Soundwalk를 통한 남산 둘레길 Soundscape 평가 연구
유지수
,
이재관
,
류훈재
외 3명
한국소음진동공학회 학술대회논문집
2018
.10
[정책사례] 대구 남구_좋은 이웃이 만들어 가는 ‘앞산 맛 둘레길’
박민경
월간 공공정책
2012
.03
A reassessment of the Jubangcheon peperite in the Cheongsong UNESCO Global Geopark : pesudo-peperite produced by hydrofracture : 수압파쇄에 의해 형성된 유사 페퍼라이트
권창우
,
정종옥
지질학회지
2018
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-359-001132242