지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.5
- 수록면
- 1 - 82 (82page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Legislation of landscape law in 2007 established legal ground for local government to manage landscape autonomously, but management policy without binding authorities and conceptual master plan failed to form, manage and preserve the landscape features. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport proclaimed the amendment of landscape law in 2013 to strengthen the weak points of the landscape law 2007. Three main points of revised landscape law are summarized as follows : 1) Setting up the central governmental roles in landscape management, 2) Granting local government legal force to control landscape, 3) Compulsory landscape deliberation of infrastructure project, development project, buildings.
This research aimed to determine the direction for revision of Seoul landscape master plan and Seoul landscape ordinance. There are four improvements taking into account of amendments of landscape law and the current landscape master plan. 1) Landscape plan and design guideline system should be simplified for usability. The general landscape plan and specific landscape plan need to be consolidated into the landscape master plan and for greater efficiency of the plan. Eleven-design guidelines also should be summed up in general and specific principles to avoid duplicate of contents. At the same time, government should provide all the information of administrative procedures in relation to landscape management through building up comprehensive information system, education and public relations, etc. 2) This study suggested landscape deliberation subjects and project size which were delegated municipal landscape ordinance. Additional deliberation subjects were chosen from the projects in the act on the private investment through examination for the factors which have a negative effect on landscape. And project size of infrastructure project was decided based on estimated number of deliberation cases. 3) It is better to have relevant committees dealt with landscape issues with fulfilling their original duties for a while than to compose separate landscape committee. But landscape deliberative committee will be considered to be organized in the future for effective landscape management. As a control tool of landscape, the research suggested revision of landscape and aesthetic control district based on the actual conditions of the districts. 4) Differentiation strategies of landscape project and agreement were proposed from human town project. landscape project and agreement should be used a compensation for imposing controls of private property in landscape and aesthetic control district. To promote resident-driven project, it is considered to run idea contests for improving neighborhood landscape such as revisitable placemaking, supporting implementation of specific landscape plan.
Without consideration of the present condition, it is very difficult to establish practicable landscape plan. Thus, analysing limitation of existing landscape plan, researching current status of landscape and aesthetic control district needs to conducted before starting landscape master plan making. If necessary, amendment or enactment of landscape ordinances can be suggested to execute landscape plan.
This research aimed to determine the direction for revision of Seoul landscape master plan and Seoul landscape ordinance. There are four improvements taking into account of amendments of landscape law and the current landscape master plan. 1) Landscape plan and design guideline system should be simplified for usability. The general landscape plan and specific landscape plan need to be consolidated into the landscape master plan and for greater efficiency of the plan. Eleven-design guidelines also should be summed up in general and specific principles to avoid duplicate of contents. At the same time, government should provide all the information of administrative procedures in relation to landscape management through building up comprehensive information system, education and public relations, etc. 2) This study suggested landscape deliberation subjects and project size which were delegated municipal landscape ordinance. Additional deliberation subjects were chosen from the projects in the act on the private investment through examination for the factors which have a negative effect on landscape. And project size of infrastructure project was decided based on estimated number of deliberation cases. 3) It is better to have relevant committees dealt with landscape issues with fulfilling their original duties for a while than to compose separate landscape committee. But landscape deliberative committee will be considered to be organized in the future for effective landscape management. As a control tool of landscape, the research suggested revision of landscape and aesthetic control district based on the actual conditions of the districts. 4) Differentiation strategies of landscape project and agreement were proposed from human town project. landscape project and agreement should be used a compensation for imposing controls of private property in landscape and aesthetic control district. To promote resident-driven project, it is considered to run idea contests for improving neighborhood landscape such as revisitable placemaking, supporting implementation of specific landscape plan.
Without consideration of the present condition, it is very difficult to establish practicable landscape plan. Thus, analysing limitation of existing landscape plan, researching current status of landscape and aesthetic control district needs to conducted before starting landscape master plan making. If necessary, amendment or enactment of landscape ordinances can be suggested to execute landscape plan.
목차
[표지]
[요약 및 정책건의]
1. 연구의 개요
2. 주요 연구결과
3. 서울시 경관정책의 개선 방향
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[I. 연구의 개요]
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 연구의 내용 및 방법
[II. 기존 경관정책 및 여건변화 검토]
1. 기존 경관정책의 검토
2. 경관정책의 여건변화
3. 소결
[III. 서울시 경관정책의 개선방향]
1. 활용성을 고려한 경관계획 및 지침체계 정비
2. 경관법 개정에 따른 경관심의 대상 구체화
3. 경관심의 및 도시관리 수단의 운영 방안
4. 차별성 있는 경관사업 및 협정의 방향 설정
[IV. 결론 및 향후 연구과제]
1. 연구의 종합
2. 향후 추진 연구과제
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[Table of Contents]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-359-001132257