지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.1
- 수록면
- 1 - 109 (109page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The objectives of this Study are to evaluate the quality of public transport commuting and identify new directions of public transport service improvements.
The research was based on survey results of public transport commuters in three downtowns(CBD, two subcenters：Gangnam and Yeoido) of Seoul. Significant survey results are summerized in the following.
Current congestion levels of bus and subway are 94.5% and 140.5% respectively. On the other hand, acceptable congestion levels of bus and subway are 50.0% and 60.6%.
[그림본문참조]
The most important factors for the choice of public transport in order to commute are ‘total travel time’ and ‘access time’ which are determined by the choices of residential and work place. However, the most inconvenient factors are ‘waiting time’ and ‘transfer time’ because these two factors are determined by the quality level of government service.
[그림본문참조]
A public transport happiness index was created in order to evaluate the quality of public transport commuting. The index consist of two groups of factors. The first quantitative group reflects differences of current and acceptable level for access time, waiting time, transfer time, total travel time and congestion. The second qualitative group reflects inconvenience score for the other factors which are noise, fare, available seats, wireless communication service(wifi), kindness of drivers, comfortableness and convenient facilities. The individual importance score for the factors was used as a weight.
The average public transport happiness index for downtown commuters in Seoul is 71.3. Male, less frequent transfers and short commuting distance impact on higher happinessindex.
A sensitivity analysis of public transport happiness index assumed an acceptable level of each factor. The results showed that ‘transfer time’ was the most effective factor.
[그림본문참조]
The research was based on survey results of public transport commuters in three downtowns(CBD, two subcenters：Gangnam and Yeoido) of Seoul. Significant survey results are summerized in the following.
Current congestion levels of bus and subway are 94.5% and 140.5% respectively. On the other hand, acceptable congestion levels of bus and subway are 50.0% and 60.6%.
[그림본문참조]
The most important factors for the choice of public transport in order to commute are ‘total travel time’ and ‘access time’ which are determined by the choices of residential and work place. However, the most inconvenient factors are ‘waiting time’ and ‘transfer time’ because these two factors are determined by the quality level of government service.
[그림본문참조]
A public transport happiness index was created in order to evaluate the quality of public transport commuting. The index consist of two groups of factors. The first quantitative group reflects differences of current and acceptable level for access time, waiting time, transfer time, total travel time and congestion. The second qualitative group reflects inconvenience score for the other factors which are noise, fare, available seats, wireless communication service(wifi), kindness of drivers, comfortableness and convenient facilities. The individual importance score for the factors was used as a weight.
The average public transport happiness index for downtown commuters in Seoul is 71.3. Male, less frequent transfers and short commuting distance impact on higher happinessindex.
A sensitivity analysis of public transport happiness index assumed an acceptable level of each factor. The results showed that ‘transfer time’ was the most effective factor.
[그림본문참조]
목차
[표지]
[요약 및 정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[Ⅰ 연구의 개요]
1 연구의 배경 및 목적
2 연구의 범위와 방법
[Ⅱ 대중교통 출근통행의 질 평가요소 설정]
1 통행의 질 평가 국내사례：2010 서울시 대중교통 시민만족도 평가
2 통행의 질 평가 해외사례
3 조사문항 설계를 위한 사전조사
4 평가요소 설정
[Ⅲ 대중교통 출근통행의 질 평가를 위한 사례조사]
1 조사의 개요
2 조사의 내용 및 방법
3 조사결과
[Ⅳ 대중교통 출근통행의 질 평가]
1 영국사례
2 대중교통 행복지수 산정 방법
3 대중교통 행복지수 결과
4 대중교통 행복지수 민감도 분석
[Ⅴ 연구의 결과]
1 결론
2 정책건의
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
[Table of Contents]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-359-001132040