개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
서울시 부설주차장 설치제한 제도(주차상한제) 적용성 개선 연구
서울시 부설주차장 설치제한 제도(주차상한제) 적용성 개선 연구
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.6
- 수록면
- 1 - 132 (132page)
이용수
서울시 부설주차장 설치제한 제도(주차상한제) 적용성 개선 연구
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Seoul Metropolitan Government has implemented the policy limiting the provision of parking spaces in congested areas since 1997. The policy aims to reduce the demand of parking by discouraging car use, and is partially successful. However, the issues, such as illegal expansion of parking spaces, application of the same upper limit, and inflexibility of the policy for different types of facilities, concerning inefficiency and irrationality have occurred. The goal of this research is to strengthen the policy in more practical way, to minimize negative externalities by understanding the problems of the current policy, and to revise the policy.
The problems from the limitation of parking space policy are as follows. First, congested areas are narrowly interpreted as the most expensive parking fee zone, ignoring different conditions and unique elements of each area. This interpretation leads to objectivity deficit, inconsistency, and inequality. Second, the policy affecting areas are confined or narrow rather than far-reaching. Third, uniformed upper limit of the policy causes some facilities to gain a profit while others suffer a loss, and the profit does not go back to the public. Finally, mixed interests are caused in accordance to distinct facilities after the policy has been implemented.
To tackle these problems, this research proposes following improvement plans.
The first plan is to adjust, redefine, and expand the policy affecting areas. A way to adjust the definition of the policy affecting areas is to consider the alternatives in addition to current definition which is the most expensive parking fee zone. The alternatives considered are accessibility to public transportation, the Biotope Map, and the purpose of the facilities. These are expected to resolve the problems caused by the current narrow-defined policy affecting areas. It is concluded that accessibility to public transportation is proven to be the most important factor. In short-term, accessibility to public transportation should be considered in the most important manner, but in long-term, the definition of “the congested area” needs to be shifted from current “the most expensive parking fee zone” to “the area with easy access to public transportation”.
The second plan is to propose flexible upper limit for each facility. The current policy limits most buildings to 50% parking space. Most stakeholders agree to the point that different facilities need to have different standards for parking space limit, but the ways to set the limit has been unclear. To resolve this problem, a flexible limit which includes each facility’s uniqueness into a factor has been drawn from an expert survey analysis. It is suggested from the research, that the spacious facilities, such as department stores, discount stores, etc., requiring many parking spaces can expand their parking lots while small facilities, such as neighborhood convenience facilities, etc., requiring few parking spaces can reduce them. The result of this study should be used as a guideline rather than a strict policy, and review on each facility by a committee is suggested for practical application of different limit.
The third plan is to redistribute the social cost and profit from the policy to the public. Currently the social cost and profit are not contributed to the public at all. This research recommends a contribution related to the flexibility of the policy limiting parking space to the public.
The problems from the limitation of parking space policy are as follows. First, congested areas are narrowly interpreted as the most expensive parking fee zone, ignoring different conditions and unique elements of each area. This interpretation leads to objectivity deficit, inconsistency, and inequality. Second, the policy affecting areas are confined or narrow rather than far-reaching. Third, uniformed upper limit of the policy causes some facilities to gain a profit while others suffer a loss, and the profit does not go back to the public. Finally, mixed interests are caused in accordance to distinct facilities after the policy has been implemented.
To tackle these problems, this research proposes following improvement plans.
The first plan is to adjust, redefine, and expand the policy affecting areas. A way to adjust the definition of the policy affecting areas is to consider the alternatives in addition to current definition which is the most expensive parking fee zone. The alternatives considered are accessibility to public transportation, the Biotope Map, and the purpose of the facilities. These are expected to resolve the problems caused by the current narrow-defined policy affecting areas. It is concluded that accessibility to public transportation is proven to be the most important factor. In short-term, accessibility to public transportation should be considered in the most important manner, but in long-term, the definition of “the congested area” needs to be shifted from current “the most expensive parking fee zone” to “the area with easy access to public transportation”.
The second plan is to propose flexible upper limit for each facility. The current policy limits most buildings to 50% parking space. Most stakeholders agree to the point that different facilities need to have different standards for parking space limit, but the ways to set the limit has been unclear. To resolve this problem, a flexible limit which includes each facility’s uniqueness into a factor has been drawn from an expert survey analysis. It is suggested from the research, that the spacious facilities, such as department stores, discount stores, etc., requiring many parking spaces can expand their parking lots while small facilities, such as neighborhood convenience facilities, etc., requiring few parking spaces can reduce them. The result of this study should be used as a guideline rather than a strict policy, and review on each facility by a committee is suggested for practical application of different limit.
The third plan is to redistribute the social cost and profit from the policy to the public. Currently the social cost and profit are not contributed to the public at all. This research recommends a contribution related to the flexibility of the policy limiting parking space to the public.
목차
[표지]
[표제지]
[요약 및 정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[Ⅰ 연구의 개요]
1 연구의 배경 및 목적
2 연구의 내용 및 방법
[Ⅱ 주차상한제 현황 및 문제점]
1 주차상한제 개념 및 법제도
2 서울시 주차상한제 현황
3 서울시 주차상한제 문제점
[Ⅲ 주차상한제 국내외사례 및 기존연구]
1 주차상한제 국내외 사례
2 주차상한제 효과평가 관련연구
3 주차상한제 관련 기존연구
[Ⅳ 주차상한제 적용성 개선방안]
1 주차상한제 개선방향
2 주차상한제 대상지역 개선
3 주차상한제 운영방안 개선
[Ⅴ 결론 및 정책건의]
1 결론
2 정책건의
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
[Table of Contents]
1 연구의 개요
2 주요 연구결과
3 주차상한제 적용성 개선방안
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-359-001378971