지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.10
- 수록면
- 163 - 167 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There need to be measures for when Korea joins the TPP agreement as it embodies comprehensive prohibition of fisheries subsidy. It is a fact that Korea has endeavored to maintain fisheries subsidy during discussions such as WTO/DDA, and due to this most fisheries subsidy like tax-free oil are maintained. This has contributed greatly to maintaining domestic fishery product base and stabilizing management of fisheries.
However, because of this there was a loss of chance to renovate Korea’s fisheries structure and the it has become weak with marginal producers who rely on government subsidies. With this current situation, TPP agreement without consideration of Korea’s interests is becoming external shock that is changing fundamental structure of fisheries.
As Korea is joining TPP agreement after its establishment, under the assumption that it has to faithfully carry out the contents of the agreement there now needs to be overall reform of fisheries subsidies. Ultimately, fisheries structure has to reform into one with competitiveness and efficiency through elimination of fisheries subsidies according to government’s direct transfer payment and prevention of controversies at international agreements.
For the solution of fisheries subsidy problems, such policy changes are needed. First, overall reform of fishery subsidy must be executed. This is necessary not only for TPP agreement, but also for preemptive action for future fishery subsidy discussions, and it is a critical task for implementing a self-sustainable fisheries structure.
Second, implementation for self-sustainable fishery should be accelerated. During the reform of fishery subsidy, all cost-preserving subsidies by the government should be abolished, and especially, subsidies that negatively affect resource management should be reformed. On the other hand, support systems for resource management and environmental conservation should be strengthened to make subsidies function for the implementation of self-sustainable fishery.
Third, fishermen’s voluntary effort is necessary for profitability improvement. Also, the government needs to reform fisheries structure and their role and function of fisheries. For fisheries, the government should implement an indirect, market-oriented subsidy method for fisheries.
However, because of this there was a loss of chance to renovate Korea’s fisheries structure and the it has become weak with marginal producers who rely on government subsidies. With this current situation, TPP agreement without consideration of Korea’s interests is becoming external shock that is changing fundamental structure of fisheries.
As Korea is joining TPP agreement after its establishment, under the assumption that it has to faithfully carry out the contents of the agreement there now needs to be overall reform of fisheries subsidies. Ultimately, fisheries structure has to reform into one with competitiveness and efficiency through elimination of fisheries subsidies according to government’s direct transfer payment and prevention of controversies at international agreements.
For the solution of fisheries subsidy problems, such policy changes are needed. First, overall reform of fishery subsidy must be executed. This is necessary not only for TPP agreement, but also for preemptive action for future fishery subsidy discussions, and it is a critical task for implementing a self-sustainable fisheries structure.
Second, implementation for self-sustainable fishery should be accelerated. During the reform of fishery subsidy, all cost-preserving subsidies by the government should be abolished, and especially, subsidies that negatively affect resource management should be reformed. On the other hand, support systems for resource management and environmental conservation should be strengthened to make subsidies function for the implementation of self-sustainable fishery.
Third, fishermen’s voluntary effort is necessary for profitability improvement. Also, the government needs to reform fisheries structure and their role and function of fisheries. For fisheries, the government should implement an indirect, market-oriented subsidy method for fisheries.
목차
1. 서론
2. TPP협정 상 수산보조금 문제
3. 한국의 수산보조금 체계 개편
4. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
TPP 대응 우리나라 수산자원관리방안 연구 : 회원국간 비교분석을 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2016 .10
-
WTO 수산보조금 협상동향 연구 - 제10차 WTO 나이로비 각료회의 쟁점사안을 중심으로 -
해양비즈니스
2016 .01
-
어업인 참여 수산자원관리 운영에 대한 연구 : 수협의 휴어제 운영 사례
수산경영론집
2018 .01
-
WTO 수산보조금협정에 관한 소고
국제법평론
2024 .02
-
델파이 기법을 적용한 수산업·어촌 정책방향 연구
수산경영론집
2018 .01
-
통영지역의 일제강점기 수산관련 주요 동향에 대한 분석 -어업현황, 어획고, 주요 이슈 등을 중심으로-
수산경영론집
2015 .01
-
FAO 수산 가이드라인과 국내 수산경영학 교과와 내용 구성의 비교 연구
수산경영론집
2016 .01
-
관행어업권에 대한 소고
법학연구
2017 .11
-
수산법제의 문제점과 개선방안 연구
수산경영론집
2015 .01
-
수산재정 구조에 관한 연구
해양비즈니스
2018 .01
-
자료표괄분석을 활용한 국내 수산산업의 경영성과 분석에 관한 연구
수산경영론집
2017 .01
-
신 수산통상규범 하 한-미 수산정책 비교 연구* 주저자, 한국해양수산개발원 수산연구본부 전문연구원
해양비즈니스
2021 .01
-
맘퀴스트 생산성 지수를 이용한 국가 간 수산업 생산성 비교 연구- 수산보조금을 중심으로 -
해양비즈니스
2021 .08
-
미국의 한국수산업에 대한 원조와 수산업의 경제적 성장 및 변화 - 1950년대～1960년대를 중심으로 -
동북아 문화연구
2022 .12
-
Bringing Trade and Environmental Norms Together: The Case of the WTO Fisheries Subsidies Negotiations
Asian International Studies Review
2022 .11
-
한일 어업질서의 이행 실태와 어업관계의 개선 과제
수산경영론집
2016 .01
-
CPTPP 가입 이후 일본의 어업용 유류보조금 정책에 관한 연구
해양비즈니스
2022 .04
-
Estimating the Effects of Environmental Taxation on the Offshore Fisheries
경제연구
2019 .01
-
WTO DDA 수산보조금 규범협상 논의 동향 및 시사점 : EU 제안서를 중심으로
한양법학
2017 .08
-
근해통발어업 임금지급방식의 문제점에 관한 연구 - 선급금 지급 관행을 중심으로 -
수산경영론집
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-910-001293723