지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.11
- 수록면
- 5 - 18 (14page)
- DOI
- 10.15187/adr.2016.11.29.4.5
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background Card-based design tools have gained popularity as a means to communicate research insights and to make them usable in a design process. There are various examples of card tools and guidelines for developing a card set itself, yet there has been little research into how the usage of card tools can be systematically formulated. Although the existing literature on card tools often presents certain usages, it rarely explicates how the usage was structured, and provides few references to the underlying decisions.
Methods Through a case study of the positive emotional granularity cards, this paper presents a bottom-up approach in which designers’ needs and their own techniques to use the cards are reflected in formulating new card usage guidelines. Three design workshops were conducted, each of which explored how designers made use of the cards in the three design activities respectively: (1) assimilating nuances of positive emotions; (2) specifying emotional intentions; and (3) generating product ideas. In a creative session with design researchers, the workshop findings were translated into usage guidelines.
Results There were individual differences in designers’ ability to make use of the PEG cards. At one end of the spectrum was the designer who immediately started to play and explore the cards, creating his or her own usage rules. At the other end of the spectrum was the designer who needed instructions to get started. Most designers explored usage, but at the same time they felt insecure about getting value without having some guidance. The workshops allowed us to spot the benefits and drawbacks of the techniques the designers used, and to identify their needs in using the PEG cards. The creative session resulted in the PEG card guidelines that assist and inspire designers in the three design activities.
Conclusions Provisional usage guidelines can considerably contribute to a card tool’s usefulness, even if the card usage is envisioned to be open-ended and versatile. The bottom-up approach proved valuable to generate new insights into how a card set can best be used and how designers can be guided when using the card set.
Methods Through a case study of the positive emotional granularity cards, this paper presents a bottom-up approach in which designers’ needs and their own techniques to use the cards are reflected in formulating new card usage guidelines. Three design workshops were conducted, each of which explored how designers made use of the cards in the three design activities respectively: (1) assimilating nuances of positive emotions; (2) specifying emotional intentions; and (3) generating product ideas. In a creative session with design researchers, the workshop findings were translated into usage guidelines.
Results There were individual differences in designers’ ability to make use of the PEG cards. At one end of the spectrum was the designer who immediately started to play and explore the cards, creating his or her own usage rules. At the other end of the spectrum was the designer who needed instructions to get started. Most designers explored usage, but at the same time they felt insecure about getting value without having some guidance. The workshops allowed us to spot the benefits and drawbacks of the techniques the designers used, and to identify their needs in using the PEG cards. The creative session resulted in the PEG card guidelines that assist and inspire designers in the three design activities.
Conclusions Provisional usage guidelines can considerably contribute to a card tool’s usefulness, even if the card usage is envisioned to be open-ended and versatile. The bottom-up approach proved valuable to generate new insights into how a card set can best be used and how designers can be guided when using the card set.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The Positive Emotional Granularity Cards
3. Design Case: Development of the PEG Card Guidelines
4. General Discussion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Lighting User Experience (LUX) Cards: A Card-based Tool for the Design of Smart Lighting Solutions
Archives of Design Research
2020 .02
-
New Year’s Card Design for the Year of the Rat in 2020
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2020 .07
-
Loyalty Card
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2018 .11
-
Flash Card Design
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2022 .09
-
PROCESS-Hidden Card
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2023 .06
-
New Year’s Card Design for the Year of the Ox in 2021
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2021 .05
-
개방형 카드소팅 분석 방법 개발에 관한 연구
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .05
-
[IDEA NOTE] Card Sandwich
아르카나
2022 .09
-
[Special Idea Note] Card & Random Number
아르카나
2024 .09
-
감정카드 디자인 연구
기초조형학연구
2020 .08
-
Kids’ Safety Training Card
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2022 .11
-
[IDEA NOTE] Card To Case without Duplicate
아르카나
2022 .11
-
소비자가 인식하는 K리그 트레이딩 카드의 가치와 구매 행동에 관한 연구
한국체육과학회지
2024 .12
-
매체를 통한 가정 내 의사소통 문제 완화 연구: 중국 가정 중심의 카드 게임
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2024 .06
-
문화차이를 고려한 디자인 사고 방법에 관한 연구 - 동양과 서양의 문화차이 비교를 중심으로 -
한국문화공간건축학회논문집
2016 .01
-
신용카드 애플리케이션 사용자 경험 연구: 소비 관련 정보를 중심으로
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2022 .05
-
모던 타로카드 디자인의 기호분석
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2022 .11
-
빅데이터 시대에 카드뉴스의 유형과 활용 현황 분석
한국디자인문화학회지
2015 .12
-
체크카드에 대한 대학생의 사용패턴과 브랜드디자인의 중요성에 관한 연구
한국디자인리서치학회
2019 .01
-
WHEN TO BE CREATIVE OR NOT : A CASE STUDY OF CREDIT CARD COMPANIES` HOMEPAGES
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
A Study on the Structure of Enhancing Positive User Experience in Product Design
Liang
,
Zhi Qi
,
Cho
외 1명
한국디자인문화학회지
2024
.12
An Observational Study on the Residential Spaces and Behavioral Characteristics for Chinese Three-Generation Family Communication
Chi
,
Jin
,
Choi
외 1명
한국과학예술융합학회
2024
.09
A Study on the Aesthetic Consciousness of Geoscape Architecture -Focused on Evolutionary Aesthetics and Neuroscience-
Dai
,
Yu Hang
,
Cho
외 1명
한국디자인문화학회지
2023
.03
한국형 가족 커뮤니케이션 척도 개발에 관한 연구 : 청소년이 지각한 부모와의 의사소통 유형을 중심으로
송원숙
언론정보연구
2021
.11
We Are Family
Kim
,
So Ra
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2015
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-658-001586755