지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.12
- 수록면
- 1,024 - 1,034 (11page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the type and frequency of prosthetic complications associated with attachment types for implant overdenture.
Material and methods. In this retrospective study, 38 patients (mean age, 63.5 years) have been treated with implant overdentures from 2007 to 2014. Ten patients received a bar-clip attachment. Eleven patients had received a milled bar with Locator attachment. Seventeen patients had received a Locator attachment. The mean follow-up period was 36.9 months (range, 15-83 months). The type and frequency of prosthetic complications was recorded. The frequency was analyzed to determine the statistical difference among the 3 different attachments by using one-way ANOVA (α = .05) and Bonferroni post hoc method at a 5% level of significance.
Results. The total number of prosthetic complications was higher in the bar-clip attachment (55 events) than in the milled bar with Locator attachment (39 events) and the Locator attachment (34 events). There were no statistically significant differences, and the most common prosthetic complication was the loss of retention. In the bar-clip attachment group, the average frequency of prosthetic complications was 3.0 events per prosthesis during the first year. In the milled bar with Locator attachment and Locator attachment groups, the average frequencies were 1.45 events and 2.35 events, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in the frequency of the complication. (p = .043)
Conclusions. Compared to the bar-clip attachment, implant overdentures that use milled bars with the Locator attachment have a significantly lower incidence of prosthetic complications in the first year of follow-up after placement.
Material and methods. In this retrospective study, 38 patients (mean age, 63.5 years) have been treated with implant overdentures from 2007 to 2014. Ten patients received a bar-clip attachment. Eleven patients had received a milled bar with Locator attachment. Seventeen patients had received a Locator attachment. The mean follow-up period was 36.9 months (range, 15-83 months). The type and frequency of prosthetic complications was recorded. The frequency was analyzed to determine the statistical difference among the 3 different attachments by using one-way ANOVA (α = .05) and Bonferroni post hoc method at a 5% level of significance.
Results. The total number of prosthetic complications was higher in the bar-clip attachment (55 events) than in the milled bar with Locator attachment (39 events) and the Locator attachment (34 events). There were no statistically significant differences, and the most common prosthetic complication was the loss of retention. In the bar-clip attachment group, the average frequency of prosthetic complications was 3.0 events per prosthesis during the first year. In the milled bar with Locator attachment and Locator attachment groups, the average frequencies were 1.45 events and 2.35 events, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in the frequency of the complication. (p = .043)
Conclusions. Compared to the bar-clip attachment, implant overdentures that use milled bars with the Locator attachment have a significantly lower incidence of prosthetic complications in the first year of follow-up after placement.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Material and methods
Ⅲ. Results
Ⅳ. Discussion
Ⅴ. Conclusions
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures via Locator implant attachment and Locator bar attachment
The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics
2016 .01
-
Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length
The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics
2017 .06
-
구순구개열 환자에서 Locator 유지장치가 장착된 milled titanium bar를 이용한 가철성 임플란트 피개 국소의치의 보철수복증례
대한치과보철학회지
2015 .01
-
Locator R-Tx 부착 장치를 이용한 하악 임플란트 피개 의치 보철수복 증례
대한치과보철학회지
2020 .01
-
한 환자에서 실패한 임플란트 부착장치들의 원인과 이중관 임플란트 피개 의치의 적용
대한치과보철학회지
2018 .01
-
Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element study
The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics
2017 .01
-
Maxillary implant-supported overdenture with magnetic attachment using healing abutment: A case report
Oral Biology Research
2019 .01
-
Quality of life, patient preferences, and implant survival and success of tapered implant-retained mandibular overdentures as a function of the attachment system
Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
2023 .06
-
하악 무치악 환자에서 Parallel guide KITⓇ를 이용한 임플란트 식립 및 Locator 어태치먼트를 이용한 임플란트 피개의치 수복증례
구강회복응용과학지
2017 .03
-
심한 편측 하악 치조골 흡수를 보이는 환자에서의 임플란트 피개의치 수복 증례
대한치과보철학회지
2019 .01
-
상악 무치악 환자에서 Milled Bar와 ADD-TOC을 이용한 임플란트 피개의치 수복 증례
대한치과보철학회지
2022 .04
-
Strains around distally inclined implants retaining mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments: an in vitro study
The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics
2016 .01
-
하악 완전 무치악 환자에서 solitary attachment를 연결한 임시 보철물로 조기 부하를 가한 후, 조립식 바를 이용한 최종 임플란트 지지 피개의치 제작증례
대한치과의사협회지
2016 .01
-
편측 의수 사용 환자에서 Milled Bar와 Attachment를 이용한 임플란트 피개의치 재수복 증례
대한치과보철학회지
2022 .04
-
불량한 식립 방향을 갖는 임플란트를 이용한 하악 Milled Bar 임플란트 피개의치수복 증례
대한치과보철학회지
2016 .01
-
나사풀림과 나사파절이 동반된 실패한 임플란트 고정성 보철물의 회복증례
대한치과의사협회지
2017 .07
-
소수 잔존 치근에 Locator Root Attachment를 활용한 상악 가철성 국소의치 증례
구강회복응용과학지
2017 .09
-
Implant-supported overdentures with different bar designs: A retrospective evaluation after 5-19 years of clinical function
The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics
2015 .01
-
무치악 환자에서 기성 조립식 bar를 이용한 임플란트 피개의치 증례
대한치과보철학회지
2016 .01
-
파킨슨 병을 가진 환자의 상악 마그네틱 피개의치 및 하악 임플란트 피개의치 수복 증례
대한치과보철학회지
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-515-001866136