메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
동국대학교 불교학술원 International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture Vol.20
발행연도
2013.2
수록면
33 - 57 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present article aims to re-illuminate the problem of religious pluralism in Buddhist traditions through investigating the philosophy of the Silla Master Wonhyo (607‑76), and verifying the religious pluralistic implication that his theory of harmonization and reconciliation contains. The study clarified two questions. Firstly, how did Wonhyo understand the relationship between Buddhism and its neighboring religions? Secondly, how did Wonhyo understand the common foundation of all these religions? Buddhism has traditionally demonstrated its position of magnanimity and tolerance toward other religions or ideas. Wonhyo presented a pluralistic hermeneutics that reconciliates the arguments of truth of all the canons and the sects by inheriting Buddha’s no-strife theory and the emptiness (śūnyatā) theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Wonhyo had a great interest in the different neighboring religions, and included non-Buddhists as well as Buddhist schools in the concept of the ‘one vehicle.’ He regarded all of the various different wholesome roots of the ‘five vehicles’ and non-Buddhist teachings as the ‘one vehicle.’ Wonhyo suggested a pluralistic stance centered on Buddha-nature as the common foundation or source of universal religion and all the saints’ teachings. Because the “one-mind” that Wonhyo referred to as the body of the Buddha-nature is not a substantial reality, it must be understood as the religious experience of the return to original one-mind and mutually dynamic relations. Wonhyo proposed a holistic way of perception of truth to people who previously unfolded only one assertion or position. Wonhyo tried to solve this problem, through the insight into the origin of truth. This approach suggests an in-depth dialogical method with which to conduct dialogues between religions and ideologies.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (41)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-022-001961856