지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Modern history of Korea was a development process of nationalism. Nationalism formed in the forced order of Japanese imperialism was the driving force which prevented invasions from foreign nations and tried to reform Korea into a modern society. Formation of nationalism was aprocess of securing the homogeneity of Korean ethnicity. Nationalism could be easily formed in Korea as Korea has maintained ethnic and cultural homogeneity in its history for a long time. Especially, Silhak (實學, Practical and Realist School of Confucianism) which appeared in late Chosun dynasty criticized Sinocentric Huayilun or Hwayiron in Korean pronunciation (華夷論, Theory of the Civilized and the Barbarians) while elucidating excellence of Korean culture, and the historical studies by Silhak became the very foundation of nationalism.
Those who paid attention to social reform theory and history of Silhak under the invasion of imperialism were Eun Sik Park, Ji Yeon Jang and Chae Ho Shin, who planned reforms by compounding New Studies of the West and traditional Old Studies in Korea and established nationalism by succeeding to historical studies of Silkhak School. Spirit for Motherland and patriotism for the nation state to save it from the crisis of colonization was the very core of nationalism and they sought out them in the history.
Nationalist history was succeeded to by In Bo Jung in 1930s, who defined traditional academic studies of Korea as ‘Heohak (虛學, Void Studies)’ while emphasizing ‘Silhak (實學)’ and taking note of Yangmingxue (陽明學) as its academic study. He designated ‘spirit of Chosun’ as the spirit of Korean people which had been succeeded in Korean history and consider it as the very essence of history. In Bo Jung tried to solve the problems of Korean people through academic movements to recreate Silhak. While Eun Sik Park and Chae Ho Shin paid major attention to historical theories of Silhak and established them into theory of nationalism, In Bo jung also took additional note of the nature of social reforms of Silhak and developed it into popular academic movements, orienting toward a new theory of nationalism.
Those who paid attention to social reform theory and history of Silhak under the invasion of imperialism were Eun Sik Park, Ji Yeon Jang and Chae Ho Shin, who planned reforms by compounding New Studies of the West and traditional Old Studies in Korea and established nationalism by succeeding to historical studies of Silkhak School. Spirit for Motherland and patriotism for the nation state to save it from the crisis of colonization was the very core of nationalism and they sought out them in the history.
Nationalist history was succeeded to by In Bo Jung in 1930s, who defined traditional academic studies of Korea as ‘Heohak (虛學, Void Studies)’ while emphasizing ‘Silhak (實學)’ and taking note of Yangmingxue (陽明學) as its academic study. He designated ‘spirit of Chosun’ as the spirit of Korean people which had been succeeded in Korean history and consider it as the very essence of history. In Bo Jung tried to solve the problems of Korean people through academic movements to recreate Silhak. While Eun Sik Park and Chae Ho Shin paid major attention to historical theories of Silhak and established them into theory of nationalism, In Bo jung also took additional note of the nature of social reforms of Silhak and developed it into popular academic movements, orienting toward a new theory of nationalism.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 조선후기 화이관의 변화와 자국사(自國史) 인식
3. 국권 침탈 전후 ‘민족주의’의 등장과 역사서술
4. 강점 후 민족의식의 발전과 국혼론적 역사인식
5. 1930년대 민족주의의 새로운 전개 : 정인보의 실학과 역사학
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선후기 실학 연구의 추이와 성과 : 해방 후 한국에서의 실학 연구, 방법과 문제의식
한국사연구
2019 .03
-
제7차 교육과정기~2018 개정 교육과정기 한국사 교과서의 실학 서술 -고등학교 한국사를 중심으로-
역사와교육
2022 .11
-
실학(實學)과 실학파(實學派) 문학의 쟁점과 방향
동방한문학
2024 .09
-
근대 초기 실학의 존재론 : 실학 인식의 방향 전환을 위하여
역사비평
2018 .02
-
조선후기 실학 연구의 고민과 반성 - 그 방법적 모색을 중심으로
율곡학연구
2021 .12
-
조선 시대 실학 용법에 대한 거시적 일고찰
개념과 소통
2020 .01
-
19세기 말∼20세기 초 한·중·일 삼국의 실학 개념
개념과 소통
2015 .01
-
조선후기 실학의 변증법적 전환
동방문화와 사상
2022 .06
-
實學 硏究의 未來에 대하여
한국실학연구
2023 .06
-
교육과정 개정을 앞두고 살펴보는 실학 교육의 현황과 전망
역사와교육
2022 .11
-
2015․2022 개정 교육과정 속 실학과 중․고등학교 실학 수업 설계 - 학생의 삶과 연계된 학습을 중심으로-
역사교육논집
2024 .06
-
實學 개념들의 통합적 이해를 위한 試論
한국실학연구
2016 .01
-
實學은 하나인가, 여럿인가, 아니면 애초에 없었던 것인가 - ‘미래 실학’을 위한 방향 모색
한국실학연구
2016 .01
-
초등 역사 수업에서 실학 이야기하기 -확산적 서사로의 재구성-
역사교육논집
2024 .06
-
关于实学研究的未来
한국실학연구
2023 .06
-
Rethinking Chinese Nationalism in Transnational Contexts
외국학연구
2015 .01
-
Nationalism and Ethnicity: Korean-Chinese Academics’ Views on China’s Multi-Ethnic Nationalism
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2016 .06
-
Rethinking the Foundation and Development of “East Asian Silhak”: With a Focus on the Establishment of Its Concept and Periodic Classification
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .02
-
1930년대 조선학 운동가들의 ‘실’담론과 ‘실학’개념의 형성 I - 정인보의 ‘조선학’과 ‘실사구시의 학’을 중심으로 -
양명학
2022 .12
-
우리 것에 대한 관심이 고조되다 -실학과 ‘자주성’, 그리고 교과서-
역사교육논집
2024 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
재동 및 구리개 제중원의 입지와 배치 및 공간 구성에 관한 재고찰
이연경
의사학
2016
.12
분원공소기(分院貢所期, 1883-1895) 왕실용 백자의 진상체계와 진상용 백자의 성격 : 분원자기공소절목과 하재일기의 비교분석을 통해
구혜인
역사와 담론
2017
.01
거문도가 경험한 제국주의와 근대
이영호
도서문화
2016
.12
근대 아시아 해양과 과국적(跨國的) 상인 디아스포라의 형성 : 「양행(洋行)」에서「구교(歐僑)」로
강진아
역사학보
2016
.12
실학 개념의 재정립 : 탐구의 학으로서의 실학
심경호
인간·환경·미래
2008
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-151-002232127