지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The provision of the Duty of Measures in the Case of Maritime Accidents under the Maritime Safety Act and Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships is similar and different. However, the Duty of Measures in the Case of Maritime Accidents between under the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships shall be regulated differently. In other words, it is doubtable to proper that the scope, content, and a person of the duty of measures needed in the case of accidents except trade ports and their other places make a difference and criminal punishment is regulated differently if the accident happens.
It is known that the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships are to purpose the safety and maintenance of order of ship traffic in common. Thus, it is not reasonable that the scope and content of the duty of measures, etc are regulated differently in the case of accidents because the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships are to remove the risk of obstacle of maritime traffic. For example, land traffic does not distinguish a public road or express way in the case of accidents so that Article 54 of the Road Traffic Act imposes the duty of measures needed in the case of accidents and this regard is to purpose to secure smooth traffic in order to remove the risk and obstacle of land traffic from the accident. Therefore, it is not reasonable that the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships regulate the duty of measures differently.
In Japan, the Japanese Maritime Traffic Act regulates the duty of measures needed in the case of accidents not to regulate it under the Japanese Open Port Ordinance Act and Maritime Traffic Act except trade ports and their other places if the accident happens. It is reasonable that Korea shall regulate the duty of measures needed in the case of accidents equally under the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships and if the Acts is to purpose the safety and maintenance of order of ship traffic, they shall be regulated equally not to regulate the contents of the duty of measures needed in the case of accidents under the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships. It is reasonable that the best is to regulate it expressly under the Maritime Safety Act, but I think that the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships shall regulate the concreted and detailed contents of necessary measures with the same duty of measures if the contents of necessary measures is shown under concreted and detailed methods in the case of accidents in the trade port.
It is known that the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships are to purpose the safety and maintenance of order of ship traffic in common. Thus, it is not reasonable that the scope and content of the duty of measures, etc are regulated differently in the case of accidents because the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships are to remove the risk of obstacle of maritime traffic. For example, land traffic does not distinguish a public road or express way in the case of accidents so that Article 54 of the Road Traffic Act imposes the duty of measures needed in the case of accidents and this regard is to purpose to secure smooth traffic in order to remove the risk and obstacle of land traffic from the accident. Therefore, it is not reasonable that the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships regulate the duty of measures differently.
In Japan, the Japanese Maritime Traffic Act regulates the duty of measures needed in the case of accidents not to regulate it under the Japanese Open Port Ordinance Act and Maritime Traffic Act except trade ports and their other places if the accident happens. It is reasonable that Korea shall regulate the duty of measures needed in the case of accidents equally under the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships and if the Acts is to purpose the safety and maintenance of order of ship traffic, they shall be regulated equally not to regulate the contents of the duty of measures needed in the case of accidents under the Maritime Safety Act and the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships. It is reasonable that the best is to regulate it expressly under the Maritime Safety Act, but I think that the Act on the Arrival Departure, etc of Ships shall regulate the concreted and detailed contents of necessary measures with the same duty of measures if the contents of necessary measures is shown under concreted and detailed methods in the case of accidents in the trade port.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 적용범위
Ⅲ. 필요한 조치의무의 발생의 전제요건
Ⅳ. 조치의무자
Ⅴ. 필요한 조치
Ⅵ. 형사처벌 규정
Ⅶ. 정당성 여부
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (7)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태계 / 2012 / 항만 해상교통사고의 문제점과 대책 / 법학연구 20 (2) : 35 ~ 67
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태수 / 2016 / 선박의입항및출항등에관한법률상 해양사고 발생시 조치의무의 몇 가지 문제점 / 중앙법학 18 (1) : 223 ~ 240
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태수 / 2012 / 해사안전법상 해양사고 발생시 조치의무의 문제점 및 개선방안 / 외법논집 36 (2) : 192 ~ 203
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김형준 / 2003 / 도로교통법상 교통사고시 조치의무위반죄 / 법조 52 (3)
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김형준 / 2015 / 선원법상 구조조치의무위반죄의 몇 가지 문제점 / 중앙법학 17 (4) : 353 ~ 371
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태수 / 2016 / 선박의입항및출항등에관한법률상 해양사고 발생시 조치의무의 몇 가지 문제점 / 중앙법학 18 (1) : 223 ~ 240
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태수 / 2012 / 해사안전법상 해양사고 발생시 조치의무의 문제점 및 개선방안 / 외법논집 36 (2) : 192 ~ 203
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김형준 / 2003 / 도로교통법상 교통사고시 조치의무위반죄 / 법조 52 (3)
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김형준 / 2015 / 선원법상 구조조치의무위반죄의 몇 가지 문제점 / 중앙법학 17 (4) : 353 ~ 371
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
선박의입항및출항등에관한법률상 해양사고 발생시 조치의무의 몇 가지 문제점
중앙법학
2016 .03
-
연안항만 입?출항 선박에 대한 항법적용에 관한 고찰
해사법연구
2022 .07
-
소형선박 사고 저감 방안을 위한 기초 연구: 사고, 검사 및 교통 현황 분석을 중심으로
한국해양경찰학회보
2020 .01
-
학교안전사고를 규율하는 특별법에 관한 연구
법과정책
2019 .01
-
안전보건법령의 보호대상과 중대재해처벌법 적용의 문제
민주법학
2022 .07
-
요양시설 요양보호사의 안전사고 발생요인과 대응지식의 관계에서 인식수준과 노인돌봄태도의 조절된 매개효과에 관한 연구
한국케어매니지먼트 연구
2021 .09
-
어린이집 유아반의 안전사고 발생과 사후조치의 현황 및 정책적 시사점
육아정책연구
2022 .09
-
선박충돌사고의 원인 분석에서 항법 적용의 원칙에 관한 소고
해사법연구
2022 .11
-
종합병원 간호사의 환자안전사고에 대한 경험
융합정보논문지
2019 .01
-
선박충돌과 형사과실의 인정범위- 긴급선박 운항자의 형사책임을 중심으로 -
해사법연구
2016 .01
-
도주선박죄의 적용범위와 몇 가지 문제점
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
중대재해처벌법의 해석상 쟁점
노동법포럼
2021 .11
-
육상·해상 교통사고 야기에 대한 책임없는 자가 구조의무 불이행한 경우 형사처벌의 정당성과 그 대안
법학연구
2021 .06
-
엣지 컴퓨터를 이용한 소형 선박 안전 관리 시스템 구축 방안에 관한 연구
인터넷전자상거래연구
2022 .12
-
선박 충돌시 조치의무의 범위와 몇 가지 문제점 - 선원법을 중심으로 -
형사정책
2015 .01
-
교통사고조사에 있어서 탐정의 역할 확대방안
비교법연구
2024 .04
-
중대재해 처벌 등에 관한 법률의 도입에 따른 법적 쟁점에 대한 검토 - 해상기업을 중심으로 -
한국해법학회지
2021 .11
-
교통사고 발생에 영향을 미치는 계획요소 실증 연구 : 서울시 읍면동별 교통사고 발생건수와 사상자수를 중심으로
주택도시연구
2015 .06
-
교통안전시설 설치의 교통사고 발생에 대한 선행성 분석
한국경호경비학회지
2018 .06
-
광양항 운영 효율화를 위한 선박 입출항 개선 우선순위 분석
해운물류연구
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-360-000875918