지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Amphibious operation has developed with war history and it’s been conducting decisive role at the war. Amphibious troops did a key role when they swept the enemies and changed the war status from defensive to offensive direction.
The U.S. and U.S.S.R fully understood the usefulness and flexibilities of amphibious troops. Although the U.S.S.R was known as a continental state, it built up amphibious power. On the contrary, the U.S. was a maritime nation it utilized the Marines when it expanded it"s power to the West Pacific area.
This article examined how the U.S. Marines and U.S.S.R Naval Infantry were employed during the World War II and found out its strategic implication. There were several similarities and differences between them. Both the U.S. and U.S.S.R. employed the amphibious troops when they tried to secure the lands and islands which were strongly defended by the enemies. The Marines and Naval Infantry showed off their sufficient capacities as an assault troops to recover the lost territories. In the beginning of the World War II the Marines and Naval Infantry of both countries hadn"t full-fledged power to project, but they have expanded their size and grown their capacities during the wartime.
However, there were lots of differences between them in conducting national strategy, building up the military powers, the strategy and tactics. The U.S. Marines usually did amphibious assault which was a large scale and from the long distance. In contrast, the U.S.S.R. Naval Infantry operated within the short distance and small groups but it developed the unique tactics called “Desant” that aimed at the enemy’s side and rear area attack to support the Army. It was totally different from the U.S.’s tactics. The former not only made progress amphibious doctrine, and built up enough ships but also supported by coordinated ship and air fire when they performed the mission. It usually conducted the amphibious operation by the systematic procedures from its first step to end. The latter made use of temporary amphibious ships, since improvisational assault and Navy’s fire support was limited.
Although the U.S. Marines and U.S.S.R.’s Naval infantry were small sizes when compared with Army and Navy, they not only verified the efficiency but also showed the flexibilities of the amphibious troops.
In this study we found that the U.S Marines and U.S.S.R Naval Infantry contributed the development of various amphibious operational skills and reminded the value of their existence. The amphibious troops can be easily affected by nation’s strategy and their performances when they try to survive as an independent military service.
The U.S. and U.S.S.R fully understood the usefulness and flexibilities of amphibious troops. Although the U.S.S.R was known as a continental state, it built up amphibious power. On the contrary, the U.S. was a maritime nation it utilized the Marines when it expanded it"s power to the West Pacific area.
This article examined how the U.S. Marines and U.S.S.R Naval Infantry were employed during the World War II and found out its strategic implication. There were several similarities and differences between them. Both the U.S. and U.S.S.R. employed the amphibious troops when they tried to secure the lands and islands which were strongly defended by the enemies. The Marines and Naval Infantry showed off their sufficient capacities as an assault troops to recover the lost territories. In the beginning of the World War II the Marines and Naval Infantry of both countries hadn"t full-fledged power to project, but they have expanded their size and grown their capacities during the wartime.
However, there were lots of differences between them in conducting national strategy, building up the military powers, the strategy and tactics. The U.S. Marines usually did amphibious assault which was a large scale and from the long distance. In contrast, the U.S.S.R. Naval Infantry operated within the short distance and small groups but it developed the unique tactics called “Desant” that aimed at the enemy’s side and rear area attack to support the Army. It was totally different from the U.S.’s tactics. The former not only made progress amphibious doctrine, and built up enough ships but also supported by coordinated ship and air fire when they performed the mission. It usually conducted the amphibious operation by the systematic procedures from its first step to end. The latter made use of temporary amphibious ships, since improvisational assault and Navy’s fire support was limited.
Although the U.S. Marines and U.S.S.R.’s Naval infantry were small sizes when compared with Army and Navy, they not only verified the efficiency but also showed the flexibilities of the amphibious troops.
In this study we found that the U.S Marines and U.S.S.R Naval Infantry contributed the development of various amphibious operational skills and reminded the value of their existence. The amphibious troops can be easily affected by nation’s strategy and their performances when they try to survive as an independent military service.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
II. 상륙작전부대의 특성과 역할
III. 제2차 세계대전 시 소련과 미국의 상륙작전부대 운용
IV. 소련과 미국의 상륙작전부대 운용 비교
V. 결론 및 전략적 함의
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - 존 워리 / 2001 / 서양 고대 전쟁사 박물관 / 르네상스 : 8 ~ 35
[단행본] - Ian Speller / 2001 / Amphibious Warfare; The Theory and Practice of Amphibious Operations in the 20th Century / MBI Publishing Company : 8 ~ 12
[단행본] - Merrill L. Bartlett / 2001 / The U.S. Marines Corps: An Illustrated History / Naval Institute Press : 1 ~ 9
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김명섭 / 2008 / 아시아·태평양 전쟁이 미국 해병대의 발전에 미친 영향：상륙전 경험을 중심으로 / 국방연구 51 (2) : 133 ~ 158
[단행본] - Theodore L. Gatchel / 1996 / At the Water’s Edge: Defending against the Modern Amphibious Assault / Naval Institute Press
[단행본] - Ian Speller / 2001 / Amphibious Warfare; The Theory and Practice of Amphibious Operations in the 20th Century / MBI Publishing Company : 8 ~ 12
[단행본] - Merrill L. Bartlett / 2001 / The U.S. Marines Corps: An Illustrated History / Naval Institute Press : 1 ~ 9
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김명섭 / 2008 / 아시아·태평양 전쟁이 미국 해병대의 발전에 미친 영향：상륙전 경험을 중심으로 / 국방연구 51 (2) : 133 ~ 158
[단행본] - Theodore L. Gatchel / 1996 / At the Water’s Edge: Defending against the Modern Amphibious Assault / Naval Institute Press
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Rise of the Chinese Navy: A Tirpitzian Perspective of Sea Power and International Relations
Pacific Focus
2017 .01
-
What Naval Power Means to Seoul
Global Asia
2018 .12
-
해병대 병사들의 아동기의 심리적 외상경험과 사회적 지지가 해리증상에 미치는 영향
정신간호학회지
2015 .01
-
알프레드 T. 마한의 해군전략론과 20세기 초 미국의 해군전략 변화
군사
2021 .06
-
북한군 제2보병사단의 6·25전쟁 초기 작전 - 전투일지, 함흥에서 낙동강까지 -
군사
2020 .09
-
The Implications and Impacts of the US Marines in the Asia Pacific Region
한국동북아논총
2017 .03
-
Selective Engagement of US Naval Power in Maritime Conflicts: The Guardian of Freedom of Navigation
Pacific Focus
2021 .12
-
미2사단 이전계획 변경에 따른 동두천 활성화 방안
정책연구
2015 .07
-
상륙함의 제원 데이터 분석을 통한 상륙함의 진화와 상륙작전 패러다임의 변화 연구
한국군사학논집
2020 .06
-
6·25전쟁기 서해 유엔해군과 반공 유격부대 간의 협력관계 형성과정 연구
군사
2021 .03
-
한국전쟁 해전사(海戰史) 연구자료의 발굴과 그 효용성 : 영국 해군의 ‘작전기록’을 중심으로
군사
2019 .03
-
항일무장독립군 군사교범『步兵操典草案(보병조전초안) 의 현대적 해석과 군사사학적 함의** 본 연구는 2016년도 광주대학교 대학 연구비의 지원을 받아 수행되었음. -『보병조전과 『보병조전초안의 비교를 중심으로-
한국군사학논총
2018 .01
-
러시아 해군보병의 활동을 통해 본 시대적 기능 변화와 향후 발전 전망
한국동북아논총
2017 .12
-
6·25전쟁 정전협정 체결 전후 이승만정부의 해군정책
국제정치논총
2023 .06
-
The Influence of Naval Competition between the United States and China on the Militarization over Asian Maritime Claims
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2022 .12
-
미 육군 보병분대 변천과정 고찰을 통한 미래 보병분대 발전제언: 편제장비 보강을 중심으로
한국국방경영분석학회지
2021 .06
-
냉전기 太平洋지역 美·蘇간 해군력 경쟁 : 해양지정학의 인식 변화를 중심으로
군사
2017 .09
-
주일미군기지 일본인노무자의 6·25전쟁 종군활동과 귀환
군사
2019 .06
-
폭행의 본질과 폭행죄
법학연구
2020 .09
-
선체냉각을 위한 해수분사노즐의 산포특성에 관한 실험 연구
한국군사과학기술학회지
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
아시아·태평양전쟁 시기 대한민국 임시정부의 전시 외교활동 분석: 대미 및 대중 승인외교활동을 중심으로
최정준
한국동북아논총
2022
.03
1968년도 북한의 군사도발이 한국의 국방력 강화에 미친 영향
최정준
한국동북아논총
2020
.06
한미동맹의 제도화 측면에서 본 주한미군기지 이전사업 분석
최정준
사회과학연구
2023
.08
주한미군 철수가 한국군의 자주적 방위력 개선에 미친 영향: 주한 미 제24군단 및 제7사단의 철수 사례를 중심으로
최정준
한국동북아논총
2021
.03
6·25전쟁 기 경찰의 후방지역작전 수행 전례 분석: 지리산 및 태백산지역 공비토벌작전을 중심으로
최정준
한국동북아논총
2019
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-390-000972781