지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.93 No.2
- 발행연도
- 2017.8
- 수록면
- 82 - 87 (6page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Although there are several surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus, there is no widespread consensus. In this study, we aimed to compare primary closure, Limberg, and modified Limberg flap techniques, with each performed by each of 3 surgeons.
Methods: A total of 802 patients who were operated on for pilonidal sinus disease were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were evaluated in 3 groups: group 1 (limited excision + primary closure), group 2 (large excision + Limberg flap technique), and group 3 (large excision + modified Limberg technique). Development of early or late period complications was accepted as primary outcome.
Results: Mean patient age was 28.1 ± 6.7 years. Operation time in group 1 was 44.0 ± 14.5 minutes, and was shorter in comparison to other 2 groups (P < 0.001). One or more complications developed in 171 patients (21.3%) within study group. Highest complication rate was in group 1, with a rate of 30.7% (P < 0.001). Rate of wound dehiscence and recurrence in group 1 were differed significantly from other groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: Based on the same technique-the same surgeon approach, comparison of surgical methods for treatment of pilonidal sinus showed that modified Limberg and Limberg techniques are superior to primary closure technique in terms of general complication, wound dehiscence, and recurrence rates.
Methods: A total of 802 patients who were operated on for pilonidal sinus disease were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were evaluated in 3 groups: group 1 (limited excision + primary closure), group 2 (large excision + Limberg flap technique), and group 3 (large excision + modified Limberg technique). Development of early or late period complications was accepted as primary outcome.
Results: Mean patient age was 28.1 ± 6.7 years. Operation time in group 1 was 44.0 ± 14.5 minutes, and was shorter in comparison to other 2 groups (P < 0.001). One or more complications developed in 171 patients (21.3%) within study group. Highest complication rate was in group 1, with a rate of 30.7% (P < 0.001). Rate of wound dehiscence and recurrence in group 1 were differed significantly from other groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: Based on the same technique-the same surgeon approach, comparison of surgical methods for treatment of pilonidal sinus showed that modified Limberg and Limberg techniques are superior to primary closure technique in terms of general complication, wound dehiscence, and recurrence rates.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Limberg flap reconstruction for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with and without acute abscess: Our experience and a review of the literature
Archives of plastic surgery : APS
2019 .01
-
Evaluation of intradermal absorbable and mattress sutures to close pilonidal sinus wounds with Limberg flap : a prospective randomized comparative study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018 .02
-
Early results with the Mutaf technique : a novel offmidline approach in pilonidal sinus surgery
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .05
-
Clinical Outcomes of Off-midline Closure Technique for Pilonidal Sinus Disease
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Pilonidal Sinus Management; Bascom Flap Versus Pilonidal Pits Excision: A Single-Center Experience
Annals of Coloproctology
2021 .01
-
Unroofing curettage for treatment of simple and complex sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2022 .10
-
The power of platelet-rich plasma on operated pilonidal disease: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2025 .02
-
Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Blinded Parallel Randomized Study
Annals of Coloproctology
2019 .01
-
Inverse ’D’ incision technique in treatment of pilonidal sinus disease; excision with minimal tissue loss, closure without tension and lateral location of the suture line
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2019 .11
-
Treatment of a Chronic Open Wound Related to Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Cyst and Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report
Journal of Wound Management and Research
2023 .02
-
Pilonidal Abscess Associated With Primary Actinomycosis
Annals of Coloproctology
2015 .01
-
A Classic and Effective Approach for Managing Totally Implantable Venous-Access Port Site Dehiscence in Patients with Cancer: The Limberg Flap
Journal of Wound Management and Research
2024 .06
-
Epidural anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
2015 .01
-
Review of Computer-Aided Sinus Surgery
Hanyang Medical Reviews
2016 .01
-
모소낭의 재발률을 최소화하기 위한 Indigo-Carmine 염색시약을 이용한 광범위 절제술 : 술기보고
대한정형외과학회지
2019 .04
-
A review of complications of maxillary sinus augmentation and available treatment methods
대한구강악안면외과학회지
2019 .01
-
Use of Intraoperative Tranexamic Acid and Wound Complications in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Asian Spine Journal
2020 .01
-
A Surgical Technique for Congenital Preauricular Sinus
Archives of craniofacial surgery : ACFS
2015 .01
-
미용적인 측면을 고려한 전두동 골절과 합병증의치료
대한의사협회지
2018 .01
-
A Retrospective CT Analysis for Prelacrimal Window Access to Maxillary Sinus
Journal of Rhinology
2022 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-514-001172781