지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper attempts to explore views on evolutionism of some protestant denominations or groups in modern Korea. The four denominations or groups chosen for analysis are Presbyterianism, Methodism, non-church movement, and Seventh-Day Adventist Church (SDA).
First, presbyterian missionaries and theologians usually oppose to evolutionism. According to them, evolutionism is a kind of speculative philosophy or a kind of false science without solid scientific evidences, while the Biblical account of Special Creation is scientifically true. They insist that the Bible is not compatible with evolutionism. Second, Methodists generally argue that evolutionism is compatible with Christianity. They combined evolution with creation into the idea of theistic evolutionism. According to theistic evolutionism, evolution was set in motion by God, or God creates through evolution. Therefore Methodists reject evolutionist materialism or materialistic evolutionism. Third, non-church movements (無敎會主義) have a tendency to accept evolutionism. While Gyo-sin Gim (金敎臣), one of the pioneers of the non-church movement in Korea, claimed that the contents of the Bible could be supported by the scientific discoveries made by modern geological researches, Seok-heon Ham (咸錫憲), another leading figure of the movement, stressed the value of evolutionism in understanding the providence of God. Finally, SDA is the most strongly against evolutionism. SDA emphasizes that evolutionism is not only an error but also evil.
In conclusion, while Biblical literalism and fundamentalist theology of presbyterianism and SDA take negative stances on evolutionism, Biblical criticism and theological liberalism in Methodism and non-church movements led to positive approaches to evolutionism.
First, presbyterian missionaries and theologians usually oppose to evolutionism. According to them, evolutionism is a kind of speculative philosophy or a kind of false science without solid scientific evidences, while the Biblical account of Special Creation is scientifically true. They insist that the Bible is not compatible with evolutionism. Second, Methodists generally argue that evolutionism is compatible with Christianity. They combined evolution with creation into the idea of theistic evolutionism. According to theistic evolutionism, evolution was set in motion by God, or God creates through evolution. Therefore Methodists reject evolutionist materialism or materialistic evolutionism. Third, non-church movements (無敎會主義) have a tendency to accept evolutionism. While Gyo-sin Gim (金敎臣), one of the pioneers of the non-church movement in Korea, claimed that the contents of the Bible could be supported by the scientific discoveries made by modern geological researches, Seok-heon Ham (咸錫憲), another leading figure of the movement, stressed the value of evolutionism in understanding the providence of God. Finally, SDA is the most strongly against evolutionism. SDA emphasizes that evolutionism is not only an error but also evil.
In conclusion, while Biblical literalism and fundamentalist theology of presbyterianism and SDA take negative stances on evolutionism, Biblical criticism and theological liberalism in Methodism and non-church movements led to positive approaches to evolutionism.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 미국 개신교계의 창조-진화 논쟁
Ⅲ. 해방 이전 개신교의 진화론 인식
Ⅳ. 나가며
참고문헌
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
유신론적 진화론의 신학적 고찰
창조론오픈포럼
2018 .07
-
The Challenge of Mechanistic Biology and Reactions of Theology : Sociobiology, Evolutionary Psychology, and Critical Responses of Theistic Evolution
한국기독교신학논총
2018 .07
-
기원에 관한 과학적 고찰 : 창조론, 진화론 및 유신진화론
Origin Research Journal
2024 .10
-
창조론과 유신론적 진화론을 통해서 본 세계관
창조론오픈포럼
2015 .02
-
개혁주의 성경학 방법론
신학지남
2015 .09
-
한국개신교 성서문자주의를 넘어서: 기독교교육에서의 성서 읽기
기독교교육 논총
2015 .01
-
The Art of Biblical Performance: Biblical Performance Criticism and the Old Testament Narratives
성경원문연구
2020 .10
-
한국 재림교회의 공공신학 이해와 실천
신학과 학문
2022 .04
-
정류 이상근 박사의 성서 해석 : 그의 고린도후서 주석을 중심으로
장신논단
2018 .03
-
진화의 세 가지 층위
창조론오픈포럼
2019 .02
-
자연의 신학과 자연의 과학
신학연구
2017 .12
-
창조 이야기 속에 담긴 교육적, 신앙적 의미
창조론오픈포럼
2018 .07
-
워필드의 창조론 재고
한국개혁신학
2021 .08
-
웨인 그루뎀의 창조론 : 유신진화론 비판을 중심으로
창조론오픈포럼
2020 .02
-
렘브란트, 성서를 가르치다: 렘브란트의 문학비평적 성서해석과 드라마틱한 성서교육
기독교교육 논총
2016 .01
-
한국의 창조론 논의 현황
창조론오픈포럼
2020 .02
-
종교계의 국채보상운동 참여 양상과 성격
한국독립운동사연구
2023 .11
-
지적 설계와 유신 진화론의 기독교 자연신학으로서의 효용과 한계 : 개혁신학의 관점에서의 평가
Origin Research Journal
2021 .10
-
화이트헤드주의 진화 신학 소고 - 존 호트(John F. Haught)의 진화 신학
신학사상
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-205-001251305