지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제105호
- 발행연도
- 2017.9
- 수록면
- 283 - 314 (32page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2017.09.105.283
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Blood ties and regionalism have served as two very important pillars sustaining the Korean society for a long time, and scholars concentrated their attention upon the so-called “same last-name villages,” which were villages populated by members of the patrilineal kin or with the same last name. Attempted in this article is a reconstruction of the Hapcheon Yi kinship members’ situation -through the Danseong region’s household register recordsin order to determine how members of this kinship group managed to coexist and interact with each other.
The Hapcheon Yi kinship members first entered Danseong in the 15<SUP>th</SUP> century, and spreaded throughout the region. They continued to move around up until the 19<SUP>th</SUP> century, and diverged into many social classes. This kind of situation would not have allowed these same last-name villages abovementioned to naturally form. The most interesting case to note is the Mukgok-ri village which is known to have been a “same last-name village.”
Members of the Hapcheon Yi kinship and the Gang’yang Yi house, who have been coexisting in the same Mukgok-ri village since the early 18<SUP>th</SUP> century, decided to finally merge their two houses’ regional titles(Bon’gwan) into one (“Hapcheon”), on the occasion of publishing the very first genealogy record for both of their houses in the 1760s. These two houses had not done so for a very long time, because the blood-relationship between the two houses was unclear at best, and they had no reason or opportunity to grow a sense of family. But they decided to do so at this point, while the other Hapcheon Yi kinship members who were residing in town of Danseong whose blood ties with other Hapcheon Yi kinship members in other areas within Danseong were more than clear, were actually excluded from the genealogy production altogether, since their social status was low.
As we can see, since the late Joseon dynasty period through the early 20<SUP>th</SUP> century, the process of kinship groups or houses regrouping, or the formation of same last-name villages, were determined by a complicated social structure run by a number of variables such as blood ties, regionalism and social classes.
The Hapcheon Yi kinship members first entered Danseong in the 15<SUP>th</SUP> century, and spreaded throughout the region. They continued to move around up until the 19<SUP>th</SUP> century, and diverged into many social classes. This kind of situation would not have allowed these same last-name villages abovementioned to naturally form. The most interesting case to note is the Mukgok-ri village which is known to have been a “same last-name village.”
Members of the Hapcheon Yi kinship and the Gang’yang Yi house, who have been coexisting in the same Mukgok-ri village since the early 18<SUP>th</SUP> century, decided to finally merge their two houses’ regional titles(Bon’gwan) into one (“Hapcheon”), on the occasion of publishing the very first genealogy record for both of their houses in the 1760s. These two houses had not done so for a very long time, because the blood-relationship between the two houses was unclear at best, and they had no reason or opportunity to grow a sense of family. But they decided to do so at this point, while the other Hapcheon Yi kinship members who were residing in town of Danseong whose blood ties with other Hapcheon Yi kinship members in other areas within Danseong were more than clear, were actually excluded from the genealogy production altogether, since their social status was low.
As we can see, since the late Joseon dynasty period through the early 20<SUP>th</SUP> century, the process of kinship groups or houses regrouping, or the formation of same last-name villages, were determined by a complicated social structure run by a number of variables such as blood ties, regionalism and social classes.
목차
머리말
1. 단성 입향부터 동성촌락 형성까지
2. 주요 가계의 거주 및 직역 계승 양상
3. 친족 결집의 조건들: 혈연, 지연, 신분
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선족의 친족관계와 친족이념 : 가족의 일상생활ㆍ이동ㆍ의례를 통한 고찰
통일인문학
2015 .12
-
러시아 친족용어의 사회언어학적 연구: 인척 관계를 중심으로
외국학연구
2021 .01
-
조선후기 한 지방양반의 친족연결망 －海南尹氏 尹爾厚 친족의 사례 검토－
태동고전연구
2017 .01
-
친족어 {아저씨}, {아주머니}·{아줌마}의 비친족어로서의 확장·사용 양상
언어
2018 .03
-
한국어 복합구성 친족어의 친족 관계 표지 요소에 대하여
국어문학
2022 .03
-
족계의 중층적 증식 : 20세기 부계 친족 조직의 확산과 상호 관계
비교문화연구
2024 .12
-
戶籍과 族譜의 자료적 특성과 연구방법 ― 17C~20C 초 丹城地域 培養洞 陜川李氏들을 추적하며
대동문화연구
2018 .01
-
조선후기 거주이동과 혈연적 연대의 관계 －단성지역 합천이씨 가계들의 호적과 족보 분석을 통해－
한국사학보
2020 .05
-
한국어 친족 호칭어 체계의 문제점과 개선 방향
어문학
2018 .09
-
중국 소수민족 친족호칭어의 사회언어학적 연구 ― 중국⋅티베트어족(漢藏語系) 언어를 중심으로
중국어문학지
2023 .03
-
The Critical Social Turn of Queer Korean Cinema : Hospitality and the Temporal Economy of Queer Kinship in The Bacchus Lady (2016)
Korea Journal
2018 .06
-
신라 진골(眞骨) 성씨의 성립과 기능 변화 : 친족 관계의 구조 및 변동과 관련하여
역사와현실
2017 .09
-
알리기 위한 지역학, 알고 싶은 지역학 - 미국 내 한국학 수업 풍경과 연구 동향
역사비평
2021 .11
-
조선후기 호적작성과 활용을 통해 본 戶 : 동래부 사례를 중심으로
역사민속학
2015 .07
-
한국 근대 호적의 호주 및 가족 구성
[TCHCCOS] 서울과 역사
2016 .02
-
광무 연간 북한 지역 여성의 호적 기재 양상
역사민속학
2016 .12
-
조선후기 호적 연구의 현재와 향후 과제
대동문화연구
2017 .01
-
북의 생활세계에 나타난 가치관의 균열과 변화양상 연구 1 : 혈연공동체
통일인문학
2021 .09
-
현대중국어 가족 지칭어의 구어적 특징 고찰
중국어문학논집
2024 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0