메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국유럽학회 유럽연구 유럽연구 제17권
발행연도
2003.6
수록면
233 - 255 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper takes the form of a synthetic argument that concerns the European citizenship and its culturaleffects. But at the beginning it seems difficult to have an evident perspective in reference to the pastnational conception of citizenship such as European one, because in its classic definition citizenship is tied to participation in the polity of nation-states, originally, to nationality and even to nationalism of the French-English style. In this sense, Benveniste`s observation of the modalities of political group fonnaticn pnts us to be able to imagine this new land of citizenship which is emerging. In addition to this logical reason, we find today several processes challenging the classic idea of citizenship and the nation-state. One of the most important factors is the invnigrationwhich has undoubtedly become a key phenomenon in European society, leading to major changes in the actual debate concerning national identityand substantial citizenship. This process of social change has taken place with political tremors and cultural conflict, as demonstrated, for example, by the emergence of the extreme right based on the racism and nationalism toward non-European Union nationals, or by an affair hijab in France related to the secularization politics. In the wake of the Schengen agreement, there is a need for further cooperation in inn-ligation control, a harmonization of citizenship rights and nationality law, improvements in the rights of third-country nationals and new types of minority cultural rights. But the notions of European citizenship codified in the treaties, as well as the orientations of cultural politics, are still ambiguous, abstract and practically limited to the famous principals of subsdiarity. That`s why we think that the politics of European integration from above can and should be contested by that from below through which all citizens link up to actualize their own needs and interests. Far the same reason, in accordance with Carens, we assume that one European culture is first of all plural culture; that this of culture of the cultures is influenced by other cultures, directly and indirectly; that it contains inevitably conflicting elements; that it is subjected to many different, often conflicting interpretations, by both members and outsiders,

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-030-001506540