지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the 1990s, Southeast Asian region represented by ASEAN, has emerged as an important region for integration of Asia and the Pacific in the context of the ‘new regionalism’. This paper discusses the achievements and limitations of Southeast Asian regional integration by examining the history of Southeast Asian integration, the multilayered forms of cooperation that are accelerating since the 2000s, and interests of neighboring countries.
From the postcolonial period to the Cold War, Southeast Asia formed a divided regional landscape under the influence of US and Japan as well as colonial heritage. In this period, regional cooperation was achieved with the establishment of Japanese production network in this area. Since globalizaion, ASEAN, with its external expansion, starts full-fledged economic cooperation by pursuing growth strategies through attracting foreign capital. After AFTA, ASEAN’s economic cooperation and regional integration have been centered on various forms of free trade agreements ranging from individual members’ FTAs to Mega-FTAs in 2000s, and then ASEAN has a central position in (East-Asian) regional integration at various levels. However, despite the active movement of Southeast Asian regional integration(regionalism), ‘regionalization’ has not been done well.
In addition, as shown in TPP and RCEP, the powers of regional integration around Southeast Asia are superimposed at the global level represented by the United States, the regional level represented by China and Japan, and individual countries within the ASEAN. As a result, there is a possibility that Southeast Asia has a future of fragmented regionalization in the forces of multi - layered hierarchy. In short, ASEAN is relatively vulnerable to creating autonomous space in Southeast Asia and playing a central role in the Asia-Pacific region, although maintaining “ASEAN centrality”, and the future of the regional order surrounding the Asia-Pacific region is still uncertain.
From the postcolonial period to the Cold War, Southeast Asia formed a divided regional landscape under the influence of US and Japan as well as colonial heritage. In this period, regional cooperation was achieved with the establishment of Japanese production network in this area. Since globalizaion, ASEAN, with its external expansion, starts full-fledged economic cooperation by pursuing growth strategies through attracting foreign capital. After AFTA, ASEAN’s economic cooperation and regional integration have been centered on various forms of free trade agreements ranging from individual members’ FTAs to Mega-FTAs in 2000s, and then ASEAN has a central position in (East-Asian) regional integration at various levels. However, despite the active movement of Southeast Asian regional integration(regionalism), ‘regionalization’ has not been done well.
In addition, as shown in TPP and RCEP, the powers of regional integration around Southeast Asia are superimposed at the global level represented by the United States, the regional level represented by China and Japan, and individual countries within the ASEAN. As a result, there is a possibility that Southeast Asia has a future of fragmented regionalization in the forces of multi - layered hierarchy. In short, ASEAN is relatively vulnerable to creating autonomous space in Southeast Asia and playing a central role in the Asia-Pacific region, although maintaining “ASEAN centrality”, and the future of the regional order surrounding the Asia-Pacific region is still uncertain.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국의 아세안 연구: ‘아세안학’의 모색?
아시아리뷰
2017 .08
-
아세안 2019: 어수선한 주변 환경, 꾸준한 통합 추진
동남아시아연구
2020 .01
-
ADVANCING REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: CO-OPERATION BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA AND ASEAN
동남아연구
2022 .04
-
아세안 2016: 아세안 방식의 변화 또는 연속성
동남아시아연구
2017 .01
-
Towards Advanced Korea-ASEAN Economic Cooperation in Turbulent Times
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2025 .02
-
우리나라 기업의 해외진출을 위한 투자환경과 시사점 - BRIC’s 이후 신흥시장인 ASEAN을 중심으로 -
무역보험연구
2015 .12
-
Other Southeast Asias? Beyond and Within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
SUVANNABHUMI
2018 .01
-
아세안의 역내 교역 및 생산 네트워크 분석
통상정보연구
2024 .09
-
미중 갈등은 아세안 중심성(ASEAN Centrality)을 약화시키는가?: 아세안 중심성 개념에 대한 비판적 고찰을 중심으로
한국과 국제정치
2024 .09
-
A Single Identity while Facing Diversity? Exploring ASEAN Integration through Culture
SUVANNABHUMI
2022 .07
-
아세안의 발전주의적 지역개발협력과 역외의존적 지역개발
세계지역연구논총
2019 .01
-
아세안의 발전주의적 지역개발협력과 역외의존적 지역개발
세계지역연구논총
2019 .01
-
Korea’s ODA to Southeast Asia
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2015 .06
-
아세안 2022: 아직 찾지 못한 출구
동남아시아연구
2023 .02
-
동아시아 지역협력과 아세안의 리더십 전략 : 대외적 대표성과 개별적 자율성의 동태적 상호작용을 중심으로
평화연구
2016 .04
-
아세안은 “왜” 중요한가?
동남아시아연구
2020 .01
-
아세안의 중장기 통상전략과 한-아세안 협력 방안
[KIEP] 중장기통상전략연구
2022 .12
-
동아시아 지역협력에 있어서 ASEAN의 중심성 : 평가와 전망
한국동북아논총
2015 .12
-
Old Friends, New Partners, and Troubled Times: North Korea’s Relations With Southeast Asia
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-910-001342727