메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
HUR Yoonsun
저널정보
대외경제정책연구원 [KIEP] KIEP Opinions Opinions121 제121권
발행연도
2017.11
수록면
0 - 0 (1page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After several decades of development assistance, policymakers and the civil society are questioning the effect of development assistance. What results are these huge amounts of development assistance actually having? In the early 2000s, an effort was made to improve the effectiveness of development cooperation projects through results-based management in order to respond to criticism surrounding the effectiveness of assistance and scientifically demonstrate the performance of development projects. The development agencies, such as WB, USA, and Japan, have begun to demonstrate the effectiveness of development cooperation projects by rigorously assessing the impact of individual development projects on beneficiaries. It is time for Korea to adopt rigorous evaluation, such as impact evaluation, to enhance development effectiveness through evidence-based policy making. The first step for that would be to build knowledge about the importance of rigid evaluation among stakeholders. Second, more systematic selection process is needed. This is not to say that Korea's ODA evaluation system should be immediately revised and an impact evaluation conducted on all aid projects. In the short term, it is considered to implement the impact evaluation of small and innovative project to strengthen the capacity of the evaluation. In the mid-to-long term, however, a strategic assessment and feedback process should be set up to evaluate the impact of a large project that is a flagship initiative with influential results.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0