지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.11
- 수록면
- 7 - 31 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Fourth Industrial Revolution promises the radical reshaping of markets, of lifestyles, and, perhaps, even of governments and fundamental social order. Indeed, the Fourth Industrial Revolution assumes that innovation will come from widely disparate technologies into widely disparate markets, in fundamentally unpredictable ways. This paper argues that the premises of the Fourth Industrial revolution demand modesty about government policy, but nevertheless suggest certain general imperatives that should focus competition and regulatory policy. Because the Fourth Industrial Revolution promises innovation in new and surprising ways, the fundamental government imperative should be to ensure entry into markets. Indeed, entry should be the watchword across all domains. Focusing on two bodies of law and two areas of policy — competition law, regulated industries law, education, and research funding — governments can take concrete steps to improve the environment for the unpredictable and systemic innovation that the Fourth Industrial Revolution promises.
This paper starts by establishing the importance of entry policy to the Fourth Industrial Revolution and then moves to each of the identified areas, concluding by noting that “entry” as a guiding principle can shape policy in other areas (and justifying this paper’s ignoring intellectual property policy, at least until the coda). In competition law, entry policy requires continuing to attack cartels, a U.S.-style approach to vertical restraints, and merger review that is sensitive to innovation effects. In regulation, governments should separate health and safety from economic regulation, ensure interconnection to persistent monopoly, attack externalities directly, and set competitively neutral universal service policy.
Lest there be any mistake, entry defined narrowly or acting on its own cannot address all of the issues created by the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The expected innovations may create significant employment losses, population displacement, inequality, and even safety and security issues. But if entry policy is seen through a broad lens, one that is sensitive to human entry into markets and the public good aspects of education, entry as a guiding principle can support policies that themselves remedy some of the more jarring effects of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
This paper starts by establishing the importance of entry policy to the Fourth Industrial Revolution and then moves to each of the identified areas, concluding by noting that “entry” as a guiding principle can shape policy in other areas (and justifying this paper’s ignoring intellectual property policy, at least until the coda). In competition law, entry policy requires continuing to attack cartels, a U.S.-style approach to vertical restraints, and merger review that is sensitive to innovation effects. In regulation, governments should separate health and safety from economic regulation, ensure interconnection to persistent monopoly, attack externalities directly, and set competitively neutral universal service policy.
Lest there be any mistake, entry defined narrowly or acting on its own cannot address all of the issues created by the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The expected innovations may create significant employment losses, population displacement, inequality, and even safety and security issues. But if entry policy is seen through a broad lens, one that is sensitive to human entry into markets and the public good aspects of education, entry as a guiding principle can support policies that themselves remedy some of the more jarring effects of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
목차
〈ABSTRACT〉
Ⅰ. Why Entry Policy?
Ⅱ. Competition Policy
Ⅲ. Economic Regulation
Ⅳ. Education
Ⅴ. Research Funding
Ⅵ. Conclusion
〈Bibliography〉
참고문헌 (41)
참고문헌 신청
[기타자료] - / 1986 / Ball Mem. Hosp., Inc. v. Mut. Hosp. Ins., Inc., 784 F.2d 1324
[기타자료] - / 1980 / California Retail Liquor Assoc. v. Midcal Alum. Co., 445 U.S. 97
[기타자료] - / 1977 / Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. 36
[기타자료] - / 1984 / Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752
[기타자료] - / 2016 / FTC v. Penn State Hershey Med. Center, 838 F.3d 327
[기타자료] - / 1980 / California Retail Liquor Assoc. v. Midcal Alum. Co., 445 U.S. 97
[기타자료] - / 1977 / Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. 36
[기타자료] - / 1984 / Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752
[기타자료] - / 2016 / FTC v. Penn State Hershey Med. Center, 838 F.3d 327
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Its Challenges
Global Asia
2017 .06
-
4차 산업혁명과 서울시 산업정책
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2017 .12
-
4차 산업혁명에 대응한 방위산업의 경쟁력 강화 전략
연구보고서
2017 .12
-
제4차 산업혁명에 대응하는 표준전문가 경력경로 연구
한국공공관리학회 학술대회
2017 .11
-
4차 산업혁명 시대의 첨단기술과 미래 탄약의 연관성 분석
한국국방경영분석학회지
2019 .12
-
시장과 4차산업혁명
한국공공관리학회 학술대회
2017 .11
-
기본소득을 통한 4차 산업혁명기 교육혁신의 실천
마르크스주의 연구
2019 .02
-
제4차 산업혁명에 대비한 2015 개정 실과교과서의 소프트웨어 교육 단원 분석
한국컴퓨터교육학회 학술발표대회논문집
2018 .12
-
Development of Korea customs brokers business in the era of the 4th Industrial Revolution
한국관세학회 학술대회
2019 .06
-
4차 산업혁명 시대 대북 보건안보와 남북 보건협력 거버넌스
평화학연구
2018 .09
-
4차 산업혁명과 교육에 대한 예비유아교사의 생각
한국육아지원학회 학술대회지
2021 .06
-
기업의 4차산업혁명 대응 인식과 지원 방안에 관한 연구
정부행정
2023 .06
-
4차 산업혁명 시대의 기술혁신, 탈중앙 그리고 창조성
문화산업연구
2020 .09
-
A Study on Regulatory and Industrial Policies for the Industrial Paradigm Change
Occasional Paper Series
2017 .12
-
증권업 진입규제의 개선에 관한 고찰 -증권업 규제의 연혁적 고찰을 겸하여-
금융법연구
2018 .01
-
4차 산업혁명 신기술 활용은 기업의 경제적 성과로 이어지는가? - 중소기업에 대한 시사점
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2022 .11
-
Automation, Innovation and Economic Crisis: Surviving the Fourth Industrial Revolution
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2018 .12
-
4차 산업혁명시대의 직업능력개발정책 - 이행노동시장 모형을 중심으로 -
실천공학교육논문지
2017 .01
-
4차 산업혁명 관련 산업의 입지특성이 균형발전에 미치는 영향
한국지역개발학회지
2020 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0