지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.94 No.6
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 291 - 297 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: There is no standardized single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) technique in contrast to robot single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC). We tried to implement the array of instruments used in RSSC to SILC.
Methods: A series of 108 consecutive patients underwent SILC between September 2014 and July 2017 by 2 surgeons. The indication
was benign disease of the gallbladder. The perioperative outcomes were reviewed. We used the 4-channel Glove
port and conventional laparoscopic instruments.
Results: The study subjects consisted of 29 males and 79 females, and the mean age was 44.4 years (range, 16–70 years). Mean body mass index was 24.1 kg/m2. The mean working time was 25.0 ± 10.7 minutes and total operation time was 44.4 ± 12.4 minutes. There were 7 cases of conversion (additional 1 port in 4 patients, additional 2 ports in 2, and conventional 4 port technique in 1). Bile spillage from the gallbladder during the procedure occurred in 17 (15.7%). There were no postoperative complications. Postoperative hospital stay was 2.0 ± 0.6 days.
Conclusion: The alignment of the instruments in a RSSC was successfully implemented into a SILC, so that an equally effective operation was possible.
Methods: A series of 108 consecutive patients underwent SILC between September 2014 and July 2017 by 2 surgeons. The indication
was benign disease of the gallbladder. The perioperative outcomes were reviewed. We used the 4-channel Glove
port and conventional laparoscopic instruments.
Results: The study subjects consisted of 29 males and 79 females, and the mean age was 44.4 years (range, 16–70 years). Mean body mass index was 24.1 kg/m2. The mean working time was 25.0 ± 10.7 minutes and total operation time was 44.4 ± 12.4 minutes. There were 7 cases of conversion (additional 1 port in 4 patients, additional 2 ports in 2, and conventional 4 port technique in 1). Bile spillage from the gallbladder during the procedure occurred in 17 (15.7%). There were no postoperative complications. Postoperative hospital stay was 2.0 ± 0.6 days.
Conclusion: The alignment of the instruments in a RSSC was successfully implemented into a SILC, so that an equally effective operation was possible.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Evers L / 2017 / Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Surg Endosc 31 : 3437 ~ 3448
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Sajid MS / 2012 / Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials / World J Surg 36 : 2644 ~ 2653
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Haueter R / 2017 / Meta-analysis of singleport versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis / Br J Surg 104 : 1141 ~ 1159
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bucher P / 2009 / Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video) / World J Surg 33 : 1015 ~ 1019
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Choi SH / 2012 / Single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-incision and multi-port technique / ANZ J Surg 82 : 529 ~ 534
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Sajid MS / 2012 / Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials / World J Surg 36 : 2644 ~ 2653
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Haueter R / 2017 / Meta-analysis of singleport versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis / Br J Surg 104 : 1141 ~ 1159
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bucher P / 2009 / Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video) / World J Surg 33 : 1015 ~ 1019
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Choi SH / 2012 / Single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-incision and multi-port technique / ANZ J Surg 82 : 529 ~ 534
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .02
-
Comparison of Single-Incision Robotic Cholecystectomy versus conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a single Center
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2023 .05
-
Comparison of the outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .10
-
ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single- fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better?
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2025 .02
-
Advantages of Robotic Single-Site Cholecystectomy Compared to Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Using a Propensity Score Matching
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Comparision of Single incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Know-how of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
[Hapato-Biliary and Pancreas] Single-Incision Minimally Invasive Cholecystectomy: Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of da Vinci Robotic SP, Xi System, and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Comparison of clinical outcomes between minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) and open extended cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Minimally Invasive (laparoscopic And Robotic) and Open Extended Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
The First Experiences of Robotic Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Asia: A Potential Way to Expand Minimally-Invasive Single-Site Surgery?
Yonsei Medical Journal
2015 .01
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Early complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
[Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgery] A Single Center’s Initial Experiences of Single-port Robotic Cholecystectomy and Single-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison of Surgical Outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
A large-cohort comparison between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a single center; 2080 cases
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2018 .11
-
Influencing factors on postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2016 .02
-
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with Mirizzi syndrome
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018 .02
-
Outcome of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2023 .11
-
Robotic radical cholecystectomy - Systematic Approach!
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2020 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0