지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective: In this paper, some improvements for a more practical and realistic application of HRA are suggested with an example of an HRA method recently developed.
Background: Various HRA methods have been developed for quantifying human reliability of nuclear power plants. With technical bases of cognitive engineering and HRA practices, those methods aimed to reduce analysis variability and enhance traceability of the HRA process. However, several related issues needing to be resolved, were still remained.
Method: With reference to recently conducted research, some measures alleviating the indicated issues are suggested. Empirical studies and several kinds of HRA methods were benchmarked for deriving improvements.
Results: The four strategies including plant-specific guideline for task analysis, distinctive human error classification, grounding on empirical data, and clarification of performance shaping factor definition were suggested in this study.
Conclusion: A more practical method can be generated with a foundation of human cognitive theoretic and empirical findings for a next generation of HRA method.
Application: A new method is being developed for human operators in computerbased control rooms. The above suggestions will be implemented for enhanced applications of HRAs.
Background: Various HRA methods have been developed for quantifying human reliability of nuclear power plants. With technical bases of cognitive engineering and HRA practices, those methods aimed to reduce analysis variability and enhance traceability of the HRA process. However, several related issues needing to be resolved, were still remained.
Method: With reference to recently conducted research, some measures alleviating the indicated issues are suggested. Empirical studies and several kinds of HRA methods were benchmarked for deriving improvements.
Results: The four strategies including plant-specific guideline for task analysis, distinctive human error classification, grounding on empirical data, and clarification of performance shaping factor definition were suggested in this study.
Conclusion: A more practical method can be generated with a foundation of human cognitive theoretic and empirical findings for a next generation of HRA method.
Application: A new method is being developed for human operators in computerbased control rooms. The above suggestions will be implemented for enhanced applications of HRAs.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Previous Research
3. Improvements for Practical Applications
4. Application Example of Suggestions
5. Discussion and Future Works
References
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
[보고서] - Barriere, M. / 2000 / Technical Basis and Implementation Guidelines for a Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA), NUREG-1624
[단행본] - Bell, J. / 2009 / Review of human reliability assessment methods, Health and Safety Laboratory / HSE Books
[보고서] - Bladh, K. / 2014 / Evaluation of Existing Applications and Guidance on Methods for HRA - EXAM-HRA - Phase 3a Summary Report, NKS-305
[보고서] - Bowie, J. / 2015 / Establishing the Appropriate Attributes in Current Human Reliability Assessment Techniques for Nuclear Safety, NEA-CSNI-R--2015-1
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Chang, Y.J. / 2014 / The SACADA database for human reliability and human performance / Reliability Engineering & System Safety 125 : 117 ~ 133
[단행본] - Bell, J. / 2009 / Review of human reliability assessment methods, Health and Safety Laboratory / HSE Books
[보고서] - Bladh, K. / 2014 / Evaluation of Existing Applications and Guidance on Methods for HRA - EXAM-HRA - Phase 3a Summary Report, NKS-305
[보고서] - Bowie, J. / 2015 / Establishing the Appropriate Attributes in Current Human Reliability Assessment Techniques for Nuclear Safety, NEA-CSNI-R--2015-1
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Chang, Y.J. / 2014 / The SACADA database for human reliability and human performance / Reliability Engineering & System Safety 125 : 117 ~ 133
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Remaining and emerging issues pertaining to the human reliability analysis of domestic Korean nuclear power plants1
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2019 .01
-
Development of a human reliability analysis (HRA) guide for qualitative analysis with emphasis on narratives and models for tasks in extreme conditions
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2021 .02
-
SACADA and HuREX part 2: The use of SACADA and HuREX data to estimate human error probabilities
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2022 .03
-
전단 하중을 경험한 후설치 고전단 링앵커의 인장 강도
한국공간구조학회지
2018 .01
-
국내외 HRA 방법론을 통한 철도 종사자 인적 오류 개선 연구
한국철도학회 학술발표대회논문집
2024 .11
-
얇은 슬래브 단면에 정착된 고전단 링앵커(HRA)의 전단강도
한국콘크리트학회 학술대회 논문집
2018 .05
-
깊이 매립된 고전단 링앵커(HRA)의 전단강도
한국콘크리트학회 학술대회 논문집
2018 .05
-
침수사건 PSA에서 침수 격리실패 HRA 모델링 영향 분석
한국에너지학회 학술발표회
2023 .04
-
InVEST HRA 기반의 해양쓰레기 위해도평가 기법 연구
한국해양환경·에너지학회 학술대회논문집
2023 .05
-
에너지 회수형 하폐수처리를 위한 고율활성슬러지(HRAS) 기술 개발
대한토목학회 학술대회
2022 .10
-
Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis under uncertain and dynamic situations
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2022 .03
-
일반 및 복원단면에 설치된 강재용 고전단 링앵커의 전단성능과 잔존 인장강도
콘크리트학회 논문집
2021 .02
-
Human and Organizational Factors for Multi-Unit Probabilistic Safety Assessment: Identification and Characterization for the Korean case
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2019 .01
-
New method for dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on linguistic hesitant fuzzy information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2021 .11
-
수치 예측 모델을 이용한 공동주택 실내공기질 위해성 평가 방법
한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집
2016 .02
-
A plant-specific HRA sensitivity analysis considering dynamic operator actions and accident management actions
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2020 .09
-
WC-Ni-Si-B₄C계 초경합금 제조 및 스테인레스 스틸과의 확산접합
한국생산제조학회지
2015 .12
-
The effect of communication quality on team performance in digital main control room operations
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2020 .01
-
Inter-relationships between performance shaping factors for human reliability analysis of nuclear power plants
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2020 .01
-
화학물질 사고 후 수상 생태계 영향 및 회복능력 평가
대한환경공학회 학술발표논문집
2020 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-530-003167797