지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.11
- 수록면
- 1 - 158 (158page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The present study aims to identify changes in the urban conditions, strategies of spatial development, and promotion of urban centers in association with deducting the implications to the urban center policies of Seoul. The implications to Seoul can be derived as strategies related to the metropolitan transportation system and revitalization of urban centers, methods to promote urban centers, and policies of public and private partnership, by conducting case studies on the existing special urban centers of each city.
The policies studied were related to the system of urban centers in New York, London, and Tokyo. The centers published their own urban master plans such as OneNYC(2015), London Plan(2016), and First Tokyo(2016) and Interim Version of Grand Design(2017). In New York, overall seven urban centers were selected like 1 or 2 centers of each of 5 boroughs. New York positions importance on the balanced growth of its boroughs. However, London’s case seems to be similar to the system of urban centers of Seoul. London has 5 development axes in the metropolitan area and CAZ and 4 hierarchical systems of urban centers like international, metropolitan, major, and district centers accounting for 200 urban centers. Japan has a major center, 7 sub-centers, and 3 new centers. Japan calls these urban centers as core nodal point and escapes existing policies on urban centers. The centers are not limited to business functions but focus on regional original functions such as culture and history and their potentials.
In the present work, case studies are also conducted with a focus on two urban centers of each city such as New York, London, and Tokyo. The centers were Downtown Brooklyn and Long Island City in New York, King’s Cross and Stratford in London, and Daimaruyu of the Major Urban center and Shinagawa in Japan. The analyses were conducted with respect to four aspects such as a mixed development of functions introduced towards activating the urban centers, the connection between urban centers and metropolitan transportation network, various promotional policies considering regional characteristics and potential, and public-private participation from planning to management.
The present study concludes that the studied cities activated the urban centers by connecting several other metropolitan centers, other cities, and air ports by major transportation network. Secondly, all the urban centers continuously encourage mixed development with business, retail, culture, arts, and even housing. Thirdly, all the cities we studied have many tools to promote the activation of urban centers. For example, Tokyo has various tools in several cases for urban redevelopment by transferring floor-area ratio and uses, and by applying sequential developments in several different lots, and three-dimensional development of urban planning system in the related urban law. Furthermore, Tokyo is supported by many systems of the comprehensive-design area, height-use districts, special block area, urban redevelopment promotion districts, urban regeneration special districts, and national strategic special districts.
Therefore, firstly, a mixed development with housing and cultural functions should be allowed to the business and commercial districts. Secondly, it is recommended that major urban centers in Seoul should be well connected by metropolitan rapid transits. Thirdly, Seoul should have the appropriate tools of urban developments in its planning-related laws. Finally, private institutes should be encouraged to play an important role by cooperating in various developmental processes with public.
The policies studied were related to the system of urban centers in New York, London, and Tokyo. The centers published their own urban master plans such as OneNYC(2015), London Plan(2016), and First Tokyo(2016) and Interim Version of Grand Design(2017). In New York, overall seven urban centers were selected like 1 or 2 centers of each of 5 boroughs. New York positions importance on the balanced growth of its boroughs. However, London’s case seems to be similar to the system of urban centers of Seoul. London has 5 development axes in the metropolitan area and CAZ and 4 hierarchical systems of urban centers like international, metropolitan, major, and district centers accounting for 200 urban centers. Japan has a major center, 7 sub-centers, and 3 new centers. Japan calls these urban centers as core nodal point and escapes existing policies on urban centers. The centers are not limited to business functions but focus on regional original functions such as culture and history and their potentials.
In the present work, case studies are also conducted with a focus on two urban centers of each city such as New York, London, and Tokyo. The centers were Downtown Brooklyn and Long Island City in New York, King’s Cross and Stratford in London, and Daimaruyu of the Major Urban center and Shinagawa in Japan. The analyses were conducted with respect to four aspects such as a mixed development of functions introduced towards activating the urban centers, the connection between urban centers and metropolitan transportation network, various promotional policies considering regional characteristics and potential, and public-private participation from planning to management.
The present study concludes that the studied cities activated the urban centers by connecting several other metropolitan centers, other cities, and air ports by major transportation network. Secondly, all the urban centers continuously encourage mixed development with business, retail, culture, arts, and even housing. Thirdly, all the cities we studied have many tools to promote the activation of urban centers. For example, Tokyo has various tools in several cases for urban redevelopment by transferring floor-area ratio and uses, and by applying sequential developments in several different lots, and three-dimensional development of urban planning system in the related urban law. Furthermore, Tokyo is supported by many systems of the comprehensive-design area, height-use districts, special block area, urban redevelopment promotion districts, urban regeneration special districts, and national strategic special districts.
Therefore, firstly, a mixed development with housing and cultural functions should be allowed to the business and commercial districts. Secondly, it is recommended that major urban centers in Seoul should be well connected by metropolitan rapid transits. Thirdly, Seoul should have the appropriate tools of urban developments in its planning-related laws. Finally, private institutes should be encouraged to play an important role by cooperating in various developmental processes with public.
목차
[표지]
[요약]
[목차]
표
그림
[01. 연구의 개요]
1_연구의 배경 및 목적
2_연구의 범위 및 방법
3_연구의 흐름
[02. 서울의 중심지체계와 육성 실태]
1_2030 서울플랜의 공간구조구상
2_서울시 중심지 관련 계획과 추진성과
3_서울시 중심지 육성 현황과 과제
[03. 세계 대도시의 중심지체계와 육성 방향]
1_뉴욕
2_런던
3_도쿄
4_종합 및 시사점
[04. 세계 대도시의 중심지 육성 사례 분석]
1_사례 분석 개요
2_도입기능의 복합화와 집적화
3_광역교통을 통한 접근성 강화
4_지역 특성을 고려한 개발수법 적용
5_민간의 적극적인 참여 유도
6_종합 및 시사점
[05. 서울시 중심지 육성 방향과 전략]
1_중심지 육성 방향
2_중심지 육성 전략
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[Contents]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
서울시 광역중심 기능진단과 육성방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2019 .02
-
2023 BEST PB CENTER
한경MONEY
2023 .04
-
세대 간 교류를 위한 국내 종합사회복지관의 공간구성에 관한 연구
Human Ecology Research
2016 .01
-
So, you want to start a sales center? An organizational learning approach to sales center formation and growth
Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구)
2023 .06
-
교통수단의 접근성이 컨벤션센터의 성과에 미치는 영향
호텔리조트연구
2020 .01
-
피해자지원센터의 재도약을 위한 제언- 센터의 과거, 현재, 미래 -
피해자학연구
2016 .01
-
Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to Locate Logistics Centers in Vietnam: The Logisticians’ Perspective
The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics
2017 .01
-
Exploring the Link between Respect for Rights at the Regional Center for Children and Career Identity Development
Journal of Safety and Crisis Management
2024 .02
-
경로당의 기능 활성화: 인프라 확대로부터 콘텐츠 확충까지
한국노년학연구
2018 .01
-
공간통계기법을 활용한 서울시 중심지 설정 및 중심지의 입지특성과 기능에 대한 연구
주택도시연구
2022 .12
-
공간자기상관이 컨벤션센터의 성과에 미치는 영향 - 공간패널 회귀모형을 적용하여 -
호텔리조트연구
2020 .01
-
지자체-학교 협력 돌봄사업의 서울시 운영전략
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2021 .12
-
수도권 고용 중심지 변화 및 입지 특성 분석
한국지역개발학회지
2019 .11
-
국제 항공 여객운송의 네트워크 구조 분석
한국항공경영학회지
2017 .01
-
장애 영유아 부모의 지역사회자원 활용에 대한 사례연구: 서울 북부를 중심으로
Human Ecology Research
2019 .01
-
Away from Home but Still Like Home: The Impact of Home-Based Childcare Centers on Toddlers’ Language Development
International Journal of Early Childhood Education
2023 .06
-
An Analysis of the U.S. and China’s Africa Support Strategy: Centering on Development Cooperation
IFANS FOCUS
2023 .01
-
창업보육센터의 중장기 발전 전략: 창업기업 인터뷰와 선진국 창업보육센터 벤치마킹을 토대로
Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
2023 .08
-
중앙행정기관의 기록관 건립 및 운영 방안 : 법무부 기록관 사례를 중심으로
기록학연구
2019 .01
-
서울북부 어린이집 장애 영유아 부모의 지역사회자원 이용 및 요구 : 장애전담과 장애통합어린이집 중심으로
한국육아지원학회 학술대회지
2018 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
세계 대도시 중심지체계와 육성전략 비교 : 뉴욕·런던·도쿄
김선웅
,
김희진
정책리포트
2019
.07
지속가능한 도시 환경디자인을 위한 윤리적 고찰 : 파리 프롬나드 플랑테 · 뉴욕하이라인 · 서울로7017을 중심으로
윤민희
한국디자인문화학회지
2018
.09
세계도시이론의 비판적 재구성을 통해 바라 본 세계도시 서울의 형성 과정 : 외국인 전문직 이주자들의 공간적 분포를 중심으로
박배균
,
고민경
대한지리학회 학술대회논문집
2008
.05
[해외리포트] 뉴욕, 데이터 중심 스마트시티
김익회
국토
2018
.09
지속가능한 개발 사례에서 나타난 경관계획의 특성에 관한 연구 : 뉴욕 허드슨야드 개발 사례를 중심으로
경학봉
,
이광영
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2017
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-359-003117183