지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.9
- 수록면
- 401 - 421 (21page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study attempts a comparative analysis of the social movements of young people in East Asia. Since the 2000s, young people in East Asia have been coined as the “Three Giveup Generation” (South Korea), “Bomb Generation” (Taiwan), and “Loss Generation” (Japan), suggesting that they are in despair and lacking visions and hope for their future. However, the youths have been expressing their opinions on multiple issues in the form of organized action, such as the Anti-Constitutional Movement (Japan), the Sunflower Movement against China in the case of Taiwan, and the candlelight demonstrations and feminist protests in Korea. Though they share similar problems of youth unemployment, job insecurity, social inequality, their activism directed towards diverse issues and agendas reflecting each society’s contexts and situations. Therefore, such differences created multifaceted issues and agendas for future visions of youths.
In this paper, I examined the similarities and differences of youth activism in East Asia and how they are related to the youth situation and politics in each country concerning frames and repertoires of movements. Also, based on research, I argue that young people developed their way of political engagement and contentious politics reflecting their context and conditions; therefore it is necessary to debunk ‘youth deficit model,’ which regards youth as mere victims of the society. Despite visible differences in issues and frames of contentions, East Asian youth politics share many commonalities regarding repertories such as frequent use of digital media and connections to youth cultures. First of all, the prevalent use of SNS made youth activists able to organize the boundary of campus activism reaching wider public. Secondly, the exposure to SNS and online media decreased the repressive violence towards demonstrators and created peaceful demonstrations. Therefore, diverse groups could participate in activisms and contentions. However, there are differences of critical issues in three countries’ contentions reflecting youth’s situations. Overall, the similarities and differences among the youth activism in East Asian countries revealed that, despite the shared problems of East Asia’s youths, they conjure visions and hopes for society in multifaceted ways.
In this paper, I examined the similarities and differences of youth activism in East Asia and how they are related to the youth situation and politics in each country concerning frames and repertoires of movements. Also, based on research, I argue that young people developed their way of political engagement and contentious politics reflecting their context and conditions; therefore it is necessary to debunk ‘youth deficit model,’ which regards youth as mere victims of the society. Despite visible differences in issues and frames of contentions, East Asian youth politics share many commonalities regarding repertories such as frequent use of digital media and connections to youth cultures. First of all, the prevalent use of SNS made youth activists able to organize the boundary of campus activism reaching wider public. Secondly, the exposure to SNS and online media decreased the repressive violence towards demonstrators and created peaceful demonstrations. Therefore, diverse groups could participate in activisms and contentions. However, there are differences of critical issues in three countries’ contentions reflecting youth’s situations. Overall, the similarities and differences among the youth activism in East Asian countries revealed that, despite the shared problems of East Asia’s youths, they conjure visions and hopes for society in multifaceted ways.
목차
Youth in East Asia and the Rise of Activism
Youth activism and contentious politics
Youth Movement in East Asia
Media, Youth Cultures and Divergent Issues
Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영국의 청소년활동 커리큘럼 도입 배경과 특성에 관한 연구
미래청소년학회지
2023 .06
-
Azerbaijani youth in transition: Is the state youth policy effective enough?
Journal of Eurasian Studies
2021 .08
-
서울시 청소년참여 활성화방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2017 .12
-
김정은시대의 청년동맹과 청년중시정치에 관한 연구
한국동북아논총
2018 .09
-
경기도 청년정책 현황과 방향
정책연구
2018 .08
-
청년종합연구Ⅰ: 정책소외계층 청년 실태 및 정책개발
한국청소년정책연구원 연구보고서
2022 .12
-
Youth participation in Democratic Politics: Impediments and prospects
남아시아연구
2022 .02
-
Direction of Korean Youth Policy Seen through Youth Guarantee and AmeriCorps: Policy Proposal That Does Not Miss Out on Vulnerable Groups
Journal of Safety and Crisis Management
2024 .02
-
지방정부의 청년정책 만족도 및 필요도 분석 : 울산광역시 사례를 중심으로
도시행정학보
2018 .12
-
서울시 자치구 청소년의회 운영현황과 개선방향
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2020 .12
-
20대 청년들의 사회활동 실태 및 지원방안 연구
한국청소년정책연구원 연구보고서
2017 .12
-
DETERMINANTS OF YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF OECD AND EU MEMBER COUNTRIES IN 2000-2017
Journal of Economic Development
2021 .09
-
청년세대 문화와 경계짓기: 청년세대 공간의 이동을 중심으로
문화와 사회
2020 .08
-
청소년정책 재구조화 방안연구
한국청소년정책연구원 연구보고서
2019 .12
-
청년정책 거버넌스의 네트워크 구조 분석:사회연결망분석을 중심으로
도시정책연구
2018 .01
-
European and South Korean Unemployed Youth in Times of Crisis : An Analysis of Youth Unemployment Related Problems and Policies for the Young
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2016 .08
-
지역사회 청소년 정치참여를 통한 지속가능한 시민역량 활성화 방안 : 금천구 청소년의회 사례를 중심으로
정치정보연구
2017 .10
-
소년 혐오인가 사회 위기인가? : 위기청소년 담론에 대한 비판적 시론
경제와사회
2019 .12
-
국제기구의 청년 담론과 한국의 청년 정책
문화와 정치
2020 .12
-
The Future of Gender and Women’s Activism in Asia
Global Asia
2016 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-331-003565187