지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study aims to analyse the key differences of the sea waybill and electronic B/L in the international transport documents. Sea waybills look remarkably like ordinary bills of lading. Indeed, in two important ways, they are just like bills of lading: the front of the document will near a description of the quantity and apparent condition of the goods; and the back of the document provides evidence of the terms of the contract of carriage. They differ from bills of lading in that, far from indicating that the goods described are deliverable to the order of the shipper or of the consignee, they will make it explicit that the goods are deliverable only to the consignee. Again, different carries will do thai in a variety of ways. For example, the document may call itself non-negotiable, omitting the word order from the consignee box on the front of the document, and stating explicitly that the goods will be deliverable to the consignee or his authorised representative on proper proof of identity and authorisation.The Hague-Visby Rules and Hamburg Rules give no guidance as to any right to instruct the carrier in respect of goods while they are in transit. However, in applying Article 50 of the Rotterdam Rules, in particular when applying it in the context of seawaybills, straight bills of lading or ship’s delivery orders, regard would need to be had to preserve the shipper’s rights under any of those three documents even after the buyer of goods covered by them has acquired rights of its own. And, the right of control is defined at Article 1.12 of the Rotterdam Rules.The right to give instruction is further limited by the terms of Article 50.1 to three particular types of instruction in respect of the goods, relating broadly to the goods, their delivery en route, and the identity of the consignee. And, the CMI formulated the CMI Uniform Rules for Sea Waybills for voluntary incorporation into any contract of carriage covered by such a document. Recognising that neither the Hague nor the Hague-Visby Rules are applicable to sea waybills, the CMI Rules provide that a contract of carriage covered by a waybill shall be governed by whichever international or national law, if any, would have been compulsorily applicable if the contract had in fact been covered by a bill of lading or similar document of title.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (58)
참고문헌 신청
강원진 / 2007 / 신용장론(제5판) / 박영사
강진욱 / 2010 / Incoterms 2010의 개정에 따른 주요내용과 유의점에 관한 연구 / 관세학회지 11(4):69~86
김종칠 / 2010 / Incoterms® 2010의 주요 개정내용 및 실무적 시사점 / 관세학회지 11(4):87~107
박광서 / 2011 / Incoterms^® 2010의 주요 내용 및 실무상 문제점에 관한 연구 / 국제상학 26(1):5~27
박세운 / 2007 / UCP 600 해상운송서류 규정의 주요 개정사항에 관한 연구 / 무역상무연구 35:71~98
강진욱 / 2010 / Incoterms 2010의 개정에 따른 주요내용과 유의점에 관한 연구 / 관세학회지 11(4):69~86
김종칠 / 2010 / Incoterms® 2010의 주요 개정내용 및 실무적 시사점 / 관세학회지 11(4):87~107
박광서 / 2011 / Incoterms^® 2010의 주요 내용 및 실무상 문제점에 관한 연구 / 국제상학 26(1):5~27
박세운 / 2007 / UCP 600 해상운송서류 규정의 주요 개정사항에 관한 연구 / 무역상무연구 35:71~98
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-320-000234097