메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국여가레크리에이션학회 한국여가레크리에이션학회지 한국여가레크리에이션학회지 제15권
발행연도
1998.11
수록면
95 - 107 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The study applied discretion and psychological reactions which is quite common in the literature related to leisure determination. The sample site was 66 male and female adults aged from 18 to 60. The data was gathered by questionnaire survey, and analyzed mostly by calculations of the number of responses and frequency order in each activity presented. Major findings of the study were summarized as follows : 1. In general picture, majority of respondents reeled their participation motivation as medium level, and `very strongly motivated` was selected by very few. 2. In view of psychological outcomes, `pleasure` was the most common answer for their activity participation. 3. When medium level of motivation applied, 16 activities including `study` could be classified as leisure, and the other 4 including `caring pets` as non-leisure, ar at least semi-leisure. 4. However, if the psychological outcomes be considered, 18 activities excluding `study`, and `religious activities`, could be categorized as leisure. 5. More specifically, if the orded of frequencies applied, 17 activities including `study` were leisure, and 3 other activities including `caring for pets` were classified as non-leisure, or semi-leisure at least. On the other hand, in view of the psychological outcomes, `study` and `religious activities` could be said as non-leisure, and other 18 activities including `jobs` could be considered as pyre leisure.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-069-000348165