메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
유광길 (전북대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제27권 제6호 (인문사회과학 편)
발행연도
2018.12
수록면
473 - 484 (12page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2018.12.27.6.473

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This research was to explore the weight and priority order of turnover decision factors in commercial sports facilities workers and thus, provide fundamental information. For this purpose, the Delphi survey was carried out by five gurus and an hierarchy structure was established with agreed survey questions in the third round. Based on this, pair-wise comparison questionnaires were developed. The research targeted commercial sports facilities workers of sports center, table tennis facility, bowling center, swimming pool, futsal facility and badminton courts facility in Jeollabukdo provinces. SPSS WIN Ver. 21.0 and Microsoft Office Excel 2007 were used for data process. The following results came from the research.
First, the priority order(relative importance) in evaluation field of turnover decision factors was reward factor, job factor, welfare benefits factor, organizational culture factor, individual characters factor. Second, the aptitude and ability in the individual characters factor among evaluation items, job insecurity in the organizational culture factor occupied in a top rank. The low level of job autonomy in the job factor among evaluation items, low level of wage in the reward factor occupied in a top rank. And the poor welfare system in the welfare benefits factor among evaluation items occupied in a top rank. Lastly, the low level of wage, poor welfare system, lack of promotion opportunity, low level of job autonomy and low level of empowerment held high ranks in all factors, but the rigid pecking order, appropriate continuous service and uncooperative colleagueship held low in it.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 시사점
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-692-000304680