메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sang-Mo Park (Seoul National University) Ji-Man Park (Yonsei University College of Dentistry) Seong-Kyun Kim (Seoul National University) Seong-Joo Heo (Seoul National University) Jai-Young Koak (Seoul National University)
저널정보
대한치의학회 Journal of Korean Dental Science Journal of korean dental science Vol.12 No.1
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
13 - 19 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the flexural strength of provisional fixed dental prostheses which was three-dimensional (3D) printed by several build directions.
Materials and Methods: A metal jig with two abutment teeth and pontic space in the middle was fabricated. This jig was scanned with a desktop scanner and provisional restoration was designed on dental computer-aided design program. On the preprocessing software, the build angles of the restorations were arranged at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° and support was added and resultant structure was sliced to a thickness of 100 μm. Processed restorations were printed with digital light processing type 3D printer using poly methyl meta acrylate–based resin. After washing and post-curing, compressive loading was applied at a speed of 1 mm/min on a metal jig fixed to a universal testing machine. The maximum pressure at which fracture occurred was measured. For the statistical analysis, build direction was set as the independent variable and fracture strength as the dependent variable. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc analysis was conducted to compare fracture strength among groups (α=0.05).
Result: The mean flexural strength of provisional restoration 3D printed with the build direction of 0° was 1,053±168 N; it was 1,183±188 N at 30°, 1,178±81 N at 45°, 1,166±133 N at 60°, and 949±170 N at 90°. The group with a build direction of 90° showed significantly lower flexural strength than other groups (P<0.05). The flexural strength was significantly higher when the build direction was 30° than when it was 90° (P<0.01).
Conclusion: Among the build directions 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° set for 3D printing of fixed dental prosthesis, an orientation of 30° is recommended as an effective build direction for 3D printing.

목차

Introduction
Materials and Methods
Result
Discussion
Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-515-000901749