메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제53권 제1호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
1 - 19 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We argue in this paper that the permitted/non-permitted overlapping reference in English may be consistent with Principle A and B, and that even though Korean plural dependent terms superficially show overlapping reference, this property does not come from reflexives and pronouns themselves, but from the property of the plural suffix tul. According to Cho’s (1996) analysis, there are at least two functions for the Korean plural suffix tul: one for ‘x and others’, and the other for ‘general plurality’. However, we argue that Cho (1996)’s analysis of tul in caki-tul as ‘and others’ has difficulty in accounting for all the functions of the plural suffix tul. We propose in this paper that there are four functions for tul, that the plurality encoded in the form of ‘NP + tul’ in Korean functions as structurally plural, but semantically it functions both as singular and plural, and that a BVA reading, a group reading, and a mixed reading (overlapping reference) are attributed to the properties of the Korean plural morpheme tul. If our analysis is correct, then there are at least four functions for the so called plural suffix tul: one for general plurality (ordinary plural), one for acting as a singular-denoting expression (a BVA reading), one for ‘x and others’ (overlapping reference), and one for ‘all x’ (a group reading). Therefore, it is fairly reasonable to conclude that Korean plural dependent terms reveal dualistic number properties: a structurally plural dependent term in overlapping reference is an NP whose referents consist of a single entity or more than a single entity.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0