메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제54권 제3호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
209 - 227 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to provide an essential and clear formalization of palatalization and spirantization in English within the framework of Optimality Theory (henceforth OT; Prince and Smolensky 1993, McCarthy and Prince 1995). English requires a supplemental process called j-deletion after palatalization. Although the process has been regarded as fusion (or coalescence) in many works, setting up j-deletion seemed to be inevitable under the rule based and even OT framework. This would be because j-deletion has been strongly believed to raise phonological opacity inducing counter- feeding and counter-bleeding effect. This paper shows that palatalization in English has no opaque process. To deal with the processes as a kind of fusion, I employ the autosegmental view which regards features as autonomous entities and segmental change is a result of the interaction of features. In addition, I assume that vowel /i/ and glide /j/ are identical in the input, following the recent claim that syllabification does not need to be specified in the lexicon. Finally, palatalization and spirantization can successfully be accounted for without the process like j-deletion and derivational (or serial) approaches.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0