메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제55권 제4호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
111 - 131 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This thesis examines his understanding on the diversity of representation focusing on Julian Barnes’ work Talking It Over. This work suggests representation’s relativity. Although the three protagonists in Talking It Over are involved in the same event, their respective stories about the event are different from each other. In addition, they do not talk to each other even in the situation when they have to and unlike the original title, the characters tell their stories, not to each other, but to readers. Like this, the fact that there are various stories as to the same event is because their stories are based on their distinctive memories, point of view and interpretations etc. Barnes shows that there can be errors when represented even it’s the past directly seen and experienced rather than memory. Moreover, among these characters, he sets up Gillian’s occupation as a restorer where he suggests incompleteness of past representation through restorer’s occupation. Furthermore, the character Oliver reads Shostakovich’s memoir. Shostakovich is said to record only what he has seen. At the same time, he says that in Russia there’s a proverb saying “People lie as if they have seen.” This proverb implies this novel’s theme. That is, although people are known to say only what they have seen, this is only in effort and lies are always contained as one’s interpretation and ego are intervened within one’s words. In the end, representation of the past cannot but be expressed diversely, depending on the person representing it. For this reason, past representation is not objective or absolute but relative and subjective.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0