메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제54권 제4호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
115 - 132 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to analyze two apparently different contraction structures with the same mechanism. Adopting Jaeggli’s idea, this paper argues that case valued elements block contraction between infinitival to/finite auxiliary and their host both in to-contraction and finite auxiliary contraction. For the reason that contraction is assumed to be a phonological operation visible at PF and case is assumed to be directly related to PF area, although the derivational approach to contraction made here is based on Jaeggli’s idea, this paper also makes efforts to revive his idea within the minimalist theory. Problems that Jaeggli has under minimalist theory about PRO subjects with null case and successive cyclic movement of wh-phrases can be solved by assuming that DPs with no case valued and thus not visible at PF stay in the embedded spec-VP and that lexical items survive in the numeration and remerge when possible checker derived in the derivation until all the necessary features are checked. In addition, this paper further assumes that just like in the canonical interrogative sentences, a tensed feature on C in a subject question attracts the tense affix in T so that the auxiliaries appear in the head C position. Under this assumption, an analysis of finite auxiliary contractions can also be made with the same mechanism that is used to explain to-contractions.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0