메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제21권 제4호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
115 - 146 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The principle of equality of shareholders is central principle of company law. By the way, the country which stipulates expressly in law actively is, but the nation of the negative attitude is. Therefore, I think this is not the universal principle which is common in company laws, but the principle which appears from the earnest request of legal actuality. Of course, it will not be able to deny the logic which they establish in ideology of justice and balance that theory and judical precedent support. Only, the universal principle which is a high position norm because is the last bulwark for right protection and a law order maintenance, there is a necessity which will control one application which is possible. To the case to which consequently, the shareholder equal principle needs, respects a clarity and a legal stability from, after stipulating expressly in laws, about the actual condition law violation discussion to lead and, is more desirable to solve. Meantime, there is critical opinion that a view oneself that takeover defenses is not violation of the principle of equality of shareholders, is justifying for poison pills. But, when applying this principle to, the interpretation which is soft and elastic is necessary. Namely, For the whole society from certainly the company which is necessary to exist, there is not a necessity which will apply the equal principle which is uniform about hostile takeover which is the possibility which will injure the company value of the company which is such. In order defending the company value of the company which is necessary in order for the whole society from certainly from, unavoidably to the case where the situation which is special must sacrifice a shareholder equal principle is recognized, there is not a necessity which will accomplish a shareholder equal principle. To the case where like this, the rationality of handling which is unequal is recognized handling which is unequal exceptionally is permitted. And, there is to rationality judgment for handling which is unequal, different element and joins in and a necessity which will consider attributes of the attacker also there is.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (49)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0