메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제19권 제3호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
117 - 149 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Insurance Business Act §10 provide that No insurer shall operate life and nonlife insurance business concurrently except some insurance business falling under any of the following Sub-paragraphs of §10. This article composed important principles after legislation of the insurance business act. But nowadays the principle faced the challenge by the change of the business environment. In 2006, Korea Insurance Development Institute submit the "concurrent operation enlargement scheme" in the insurance industry. But life insurance companies strongly opposed to KIDI's draft in spite of the opinion is not entirely. Ministry of Finance and Economy forgiven the amendment of Insurance Business Act. In 2007, Ministry of Justice voiced the revised Commercial act draft include the §735-2 was eliminated. But life insurance industry strongly opposed the draft. Till now, life insurance industry insist that non-life insurance industry couldn't have the power to doing annuity business ground of the Commercial Act §735-2. Commercial Act §735-2 provide that the insurer of a life insurance contract may: upon the occurrence of an insured event on the life of the insured, pay the insured amount installment as an annuity, as the contractual provides. The writer review the originality and possibility of the cross marketing in the life and non-life insurance business. And conclude that it is not necessary to amend the §10, and emphasize that it is not an issue of Commercial Act but that of Insurance Business Law.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0