메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제23권 제2호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
435 - 470 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this research is to introduce the basic logic and analysis method of the Event Study whose applicability has been actively discussed in recent enforcement of anti-trust law and to review the applicability in economic analysis regarding real competition policy. Especially, this research also examined whether the Event Study method which was mainly applied to horizontal merger cases (mainly by using Eckbo & Stillman hypothesis) can be applied to judge anti- competitiveness in conglomerate merger cases. In order to apply a real case for this research, Korea Fair Trade Commission(KFTC)’s decision regarding SKT and Hanaro Telecom merger was post-evaluated. As a result of analysis, rather than efficiency-enhancing effect through providing combination product, it was concluded to support KFTC’s decision which predicted that competent merger will only to increase the effect of the cooperation and collusion of dominant business operators and the effect of anti-competitiveness by excluding competitive business operators in wire/wireless communication and broadcasting market. Also, as the KFTC pointed out at decision then, it was confirmed that SKT’s dominance in wireless communication market resulted from its exclusive using of 800MHz frequency.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0