메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영미문학페미니즘학회 영미문학페미니즘 영미문학페미니즘 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
141 - 176 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A disparity in the tenors of Susan Glaspell and “Jig” Cook’s modernist projects seems inevitable due to the hierarchical gender relation underneath the “companionate” façade of their marriage. A conspicuous sign of this disparity is the clashing historiographies between male and female characters in Tickless Time (1918) and Alison’s House (1930). A collaborative short comedy by Glaspell and Cook, Tickless Time presents a male visionary named Ian, immersed in the task of replacing the “tick” sounds of the clocks and watches at home with a sundial, and his wife who is “afraid of tickless time.” Her emotional and practical attachment to the aural materiality ― “the tick” ― of temporal movement contrasts with her husband’s preference for “eternal time,” which he believes to be delivered by the sundial. The couple may reflect the contrasting historiographies of Glaspell and Cook, one eager for the forward movement of time, and the other returning the present to the mythic and primitive past of civilization in an affinity with the ahistorical “classicism” championed by such celebrated male modernists as Eliot and Joyce. A rather timid female eagerness for temporal movement in Tickless Time evolves in Alison’s House into feminist optimism about the progress of history. A socially condemned New Woman character in the play greets the dawn of the twentieth-century under auspices of the legacy of a Victorian foremother. Closely reading the two plays, this article aims to explore the clashing historiographies of Glaspell and Cook, and contextualize them within the broader gender politics of Modernism.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0