메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Phenomena and the Transcendence in Immanence -An Essay on the Phenomenological Analysis of Being in the Early Heidegger and its Theological Origin
Recommendations
Search

현상과 초월적 내재-하이데거 초기 사상에서의 현상학적 존재 분석과 그 신학적 기원에 관하여

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Journal
Heidegger-Gesellschaft In Korea 현대유럽철학연구 현대유럽철학연구 제28호 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2012.1
Pages
263 - 329 (67page)

Usage

cover
Phenomena and the Transcendence in Immanence -An Essay on the Phenomenological Analysis of Being in the Early Heidegger and its Theological Origin
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
The objective of this investigation is to explicate the phenomenological analysis of Being in the early Heidegger and its theological origin. It is well-known that Heidegger’s Being and Time is phenomenological. In the introduction of Being and Time Heidegger himself emphasizes that every disclosure of Being as the transcendence is transcendental knowledge. This means that phenomenological truth (the disclosedness of Being) is veritas transcendentalis. But what is the origin of this phenomenological ontology? What are the reasons for the grave discrepancy between Husserlian phenomenology and Heideggerian ontology? This question can only be answered from a genealogical perspective: We should make a genealogical study on the development of Heidegger’s question of Being if we want to understand why Heidegger-unlike Husserl-regards phenomenology as a method for the ontological investigation into the meaning of Being itself. Indeed, Heidegger’s investigation into the meaning of Being itself had begun long before he became Husserl’s assistant at Freiburg. It is obvious that Heidegger took the question of Being itself as a main concern of his philosophy under the influence of F. Brentano. And it is also undeniable that Heidegger regarded the scolastic philosophy of Duns Scotus as a phenomanological ontology whose main objective is to investigate various meanings of being. Then we should conclude that Heidegger’s phenomenology was different from Husserl’s phenomenology from the beginning.

Contents

No content found

References (43)

Add References

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.