메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국전문경영인학회 전문경영인연구 전문경영인연구 제16권 제2호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
39 - 63 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Cosmopolitanism has traditionally been considered a unidimensional construct that is the opposite of localism. In this study, the authors use a multinational sample to evaluate the validity of the two-dimensional theory of cosmopolitanism proposed by previous study. Using a cross-national sample of respondents from four maximally dissimilar cultures—the United States, South Korea, Turkey, and Ukraine—the authors attempt to assess the extent to which the scale is valid as a cross-cultural instrument, thus facilitating its use in cross-national segmentation. The study provides support for the proposition that cosmopolitanism and localism are indeed two dimensions of a single construct, and that they may be measured using the same scale. The results show that the distinction between cosmopolitanism and localism found in the past study was true in every case, albeit with weaker results for the American dataset. The authors also find, as a result of testing the scale’s external validity, that cosmopolitanism has significant relationships with the following consumer variables: exposure to international media, experiences living abroad, the sizes and settings of dwellings, education level, and age. Following presentation of the results, the implications and limitations are discussed.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0