메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교형사법학회 비교형사법연구 비교형사법연구 제14권 제2호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
73 - 100 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the Unitied State, the protection of personal information is interpreted in privacy protection problem. This access mode is a noticeable in a communication region and is confirmed by various contents of「Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Street Act」,「Electronic Communication Privacy Act(ECPA)」,「Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act」,「Communication Assistance for Law Enforcement Act」. But this access mode has changed after Sep. 11 terror attacks. An example of that changes is the enactment of 「Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act」,so-called 「USA Patriot Act」. This act was based on the tough anti-terrorism policies of the U. S. post Sep. 11 terror. In terms of that contents, it drew international criticism, with some saying it could violate the people's basic human rights. On the other hand, we have been prompt in dealing with the changes of the society and the social need to protect a personal information through making laws such as 「Protection of Communications Secrets Act」, 「Protection of Personal Information Act」,「Law on the protection and use of location information」,However, on this legislative responses, there have been criticisms ① that it has poor content in respect of the procedural restriction and regulation, ② that it can cause problems of the coherence on interpretations and the confusion on applications of law in relations terms.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0