메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미시학회 현대영미시연구 현대영미시연구 제20권 제1호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
119 - 142 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study discusses the common elements and differences between DerekWalcott’s “The Spoiler’s Return” and Calypso. In an interview with TedThomas, Walcott said that his satire “The Spoiler’s Return” is based on aCalypsoinian. However, he invokes Roman and British satirists’ emotion in thepoem. Needless to say, these interview and invocation of his own show thatthe root of his satirical emotion is in both Calypsonian and Roman soils. Hispoetic theme, first-person narrative, and rhyme are almost the same as those ofthe Trinidad Calypso. His voice echoes on the Caribbeans’ poverty and mocksthe Caribbean elites’ corruption, injustice, racism, and separatism as do that ofthe Calypso singers. His voice comes from the storytelling with which theCalypso singers have used to express their themes and rhythms. His lines arerhymed as those of Calypsoes. Yet his couplet, diction, rhetoric, style, andform are different from those of Calypsoes. While Calypso singers userepetitive phrases or sentences, and choruses to make their lines rhymed, hedoesn’t do that. He rhymes different lines. His diction is more rhetorical thanthat of Calypso. It is based on metaphor, simile, and irony. Finally, hisnarrator is a humble, ugly, unfavorable and isolated attacker while those ofCalypsoes are highly heroic.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0