메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제37권 제2호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
81 - 101 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Soh, Soo-man. “Three Approaches to Understanding Ernest Hemingway’s Novels(II): Failed Works.” Studies in English Language & Literature. 37.2 (2011): 81-101. This paper aims to analyze four works of failure by Hemingway and to suggest the reasons why these novels failed by discussing the three methods useful in understanding Hemingway’s novels. The three approaches that are suggested in this paper are the essential factors in deciding the success or failure of Hemingway’s works. The three approaches are The Moment of Truth, The Tragic Hero, and The Iceberg Theory Style. All three of these factors are present in Hemingway’s successful works. However, his works of failure lack either one or two of these factors or omitted them completely. As stated above, this paper analyzes the three factors of such failed works as For Whom the Bell Tolls, Across the River and Into the Trees, To Have and Have Not, and The Garden of Eden. For Whom the Bell Tolls is considered as a work of failure because it is not written in the Iceberg Theory Style, although it has both a moment of truth and a tragic hero. Across the River and Into the Trees, To Have and Have Not, and The Garden of Eden are all considered to be failed novels because these three works do not possess any of the three factors at all. (Woosuk University)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0