메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제38권 제4호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
197 - 222 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The distinction between complements and adjuncts has been examined in myriad phrase structures in both Government Binding and Minimalism. In general, a complement defines an obligatory relation between a head and its argument, and an adjunct is an optional modification of the head. Hornstein (2009) proposed that complements require integration into structures with labels (concatenation and labeling are both required) while adjuncts do not (only concatenation is required). This paper aims to point out some problems with Hornstein’s (2009) no labeling approach to adjuncts and to propose that adjuncts should be labeled at the spell-out level after concatenation, not at the computation level. Based on the three points, namely, VP-ellipsis, No-Tampering Condition (NTC), and Inclusiveness Condition (IC), it is posited that adjuncts should be labeled at the spell-out level after concatenation. A labeled adjunct can explain differences such as Focus and Topic information in VP-ellipsis. Furthermore, assuming labeling is spelled out in the interface after concatenation can explain that adjuncts leave the constituent characteristics intact and satisfy the NTC. Also, assuming my proposal, no new objects are added in the course of the computation because labeling occurs at the spell-out level, not the computation level. As a result, it satisfies the Inclusiveness Condition (IC) (UC Santa Barbara)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0