메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국문학교육학회 문학교육학 문학교육학 제36호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
353 - 386 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of this article is to inquire into the actual state of interpretative polemics through analyzing Lee Mun-yol’s 『Selection』 and many kinds of written texts that was published after 『Selection』. The 『Selection』 prompted polemics in the Korea literary circle in the late 1990s. Many readers who have read 『Selection』 actively participated in this polemics. As a result, many interpretative texts are accumulated quantitatively and qualitatively. Therefore, these texts can contribute to examinations of the aspects of interaction in literary texts. The aspects of polemics with regard to 『Selection』 are three:(1) whether 『Selection』 has Feminism tendency or not. (2) whether 『Selection』 is a novel or not. (3) 『Selection』 is a symbol of literature power or an expression of literary right. By considering interpretative polemics, it was confirmed that reading literature is an act adding a new meaning to literary work as a symbol. Also, the meaning of literary works is affected by the subject, the object, and contexts. When the interpretative texts are analyzed, then, that multilayer of texts, diversity of communication structure, complexity for reception of readers should be noted.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0