메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
세계문학비교학회 세계문학비교연구 세계문학비교연구 제43호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
91 - 114 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper explores the rival relationship of visual and verbal modes of representation as well as the relationship between drama and narrative in The Winter’s Tale. Although The Winter’s Tale presents the dramatic spectacle of Hermione’s statue in the end, most of its significant events are not represented on the stage. Meaningful scenes including Antigonus’s dream and death, the sixteen-year gap in the play’s action, and the reunion of Leontes, Polixenes and Perdita are described or narrated by one or more of the play’s characters. Through many acts of vivid narration in the play, Shakespeare suggests that verbal description can sometimes persuade us that we are seeing the thing itself. In other words, we are asked to believe in events that are only described to us by the play’s characters such as Leontes, Antigonus, Autolycus, and gentlemen. In that sense, it seems that The Winter’s Tale’s is bold ekphrasis itself and can be read as a confident trick by Shakespeare. Shakespeare’s ekphrasis is presented as a trope that can create a powerful illusion of presence, describing many absent events that we cannot see on the stage. Skillfully juxtaposing narrative description and visual immediacy in the closing scenes, Shakespeare seems much more sophisticated than Atolycus, a narrative artist and con-man that he creates. Eventually, Shakespeare’s remarkable exploration of narrative sometimes makes the play’s characters as well as us not to tell the difference between representation(or fictions) and reality, which is related to the way in which The Winter’s Tale itself blurs that difference.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0