메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
건국대학교 법학연구소 일감법학 일감법학 제22호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
3 - 43 (41page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Korea, there have been lively discussions about Evaluation of Legislation(Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung) over ten years. Recently plans for institutionalizing evaluation of legislation are under discussion. But I think that a lot of problems remain to be solved: concept of legislative evaluation,relationship between evaluation of legislation and many another evaluations,criteria of legislative evaluation, methods of legislative evaluation, expert of legislative evaluation etc. I suggested the plans of these problems in this article. I think that it is not too late to institutionalize evaluation of legislation after a lot of problems about evaluation of legislation are solved. In Germany, evaluation of legislation is failed to be activated. Prof. Carl Böhret and Dr. Götz Konzendorf wrote the book about evaluation of legislation(Handbuch Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung(GFA): Gesetze, Verordnungen, Verwaltungsvorschriften) after they studied it over twenty years. At this point, it is important to review and supplement problems about evaluation of legislation. And it is needed to study concept, type, organ,criteria, methods, binding force of legislative evaluation, relationship between evaluation of legislation and many another evaluations etc., and to nurture expert of legislative evaluation for five or ten years. I think that it is not too late to institutionalize evaluation of legislation after problems about evaluation of legislation are solved.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0