메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
건국대학교 법학연구소 일감법학 일감법학 제23호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
467 - 496 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Once a certain interpretation of Customs Act or customs practice has been generally accepted by the duty payers, conducts or calculation in accordance therewith shall be considered as legitimate, and retroactive taxation by new interpretation or practice shall be prohibited(Customs Act Article 5-2). This principle is called Prohibition of Retroactive Taxation. In other words, if customs practice to tax free is accepted, the administrative officer shall not impose a customs tax. Generally there are many studies and curt’s decision on this topic. The rates of the customs duty shall be in the annexed tariff tax table. Therefore tariff tax table is very important to customs tax. But it is not easy to determine which number it is in tariff tax table. And whenever the number in tariff tax table is changed, the taxpayer’s belief is threatened. But it is rare that when the customs practice to tax free is subject to lapse. The Supreme court made a decision that it is subject to lapse, when the administrative officer go on record about imposing a customs tax and the taxpayer don’t believe the customs practice more. It is important to study this case, because it will give a precedent for the similar case.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0