메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
연세대학교 언어정보연구원 (구 연세대학교 언어정보개발원) 언어사실과 관점 언어사실과 관점 제30권
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
133 - 158 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purposes of this study were to reset the preferred argument structure constraints within the framework of Korean language and examine diverse types of texts. The research findings and conclusions were as follows:First, the percentage of two or more lexical arguments appearing in a single clause was very low both in English and Korean. Second, the frequency of pronouns was very high in English than in Korean, and so was the frequency of the subjects of transitive verbs appearing as pronouns. In spoken Korean, the frequency of pronouns being used was much lower than omitted arguments. In written Korean, however, the cases in which arguments were expressed lexically were considerably many, which indicates that the constraints on the subjects of lexical transitive verbs are too strong to be applied to written Korean. Third, the constraint that the number of new information arguments should be one or less was well observed across all types of texts both in English and Korean. Fourth, the frequency of the subjects of transitive verbs conveying new information was very low. The syntactic completion of sentences related to pragmatic characteristics can be enhanced by analyzing the argument structures and then tracing annotations escaping the typical preferred argument structures.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0