메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제35권 제3호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
215 - 228 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Under the participatory criminal justice system, unlike Anglo-American jury trial, a trial can be held as a bench trial in court of appeals. Consequentially, whether "guilty" or "not guilty" can be turned on prosecutor's appeal. Among 321 cases undertaken last 3years in Korea, it is only 43 cases which were not appealed. Among the appealed cases, prosecutor's appeal cases count for 53.6% which is very high. And 56.3% of these cases were concluded same as charge. The prosecutor's high appeal rate has dropped the people's trust about the participatory criminal justice system If the fact-finding judged by general common sense of the majority of people were to annul in appellate court easily, it could be against the purpose of the participatory criminal justice system. In the light of these facts, in the final model stage of the participatory criminal justice system, the appeal system shall be fundamentally reexamined. For this reason, prosecutor's appeal should be forbidden at least in fact-finding. After 2012, we shall study of the appeals court system in the participatory criminal justice system. Because it is relate to improvement of the Instanzengliederung der Gerichte system like increasement of judges, reinforcement of inferior court etc. On this point, we shall reengineer the character of appeals court. And with the legislative improvement ahead, men of affairs, especially the prosecutors, should set an example with refraining from appeal against a verdict.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0