메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제35권 제1호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
65 - 79 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Civil Code of the Philippines provides that cause of the obligation is the essential requisite of contracts(Art. 1318). Any contract can't validly exist unless there is no cause of the obligation. Although the civil law causa and the common law consideration are often used interchangeably, they are not exactly identical. The accepted concept of consideration is that it either some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, or loss suffered or undertaken by the other party. It ist said to have the element of quid pro quo, but causa is not necessarily quid pro quo. For cause includes every valuable consideration of the common law but there are causes which would not fall under consideration. The cause of a contract must not be confused with the motives of the parties in entering into it. Motive is the purely personal or private reason. With one's motives the law cannot deal, while with the cause the law is always concerned. The causa must not be contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy. A contract based upon an unlawful causa is void ab initio. The statement of a false cause in a contract may render it void, if it cannot be proved that it was founded upon another cause which is true and lawful. If no cause is stated in the contract, it is presumed that it exists and is lawful, unless the debtor proves the contrary. Except in cases specified by law a contract may not be invalidated on the ground that the cause is inadequate or there is lesion, i.e., prejudice, unless there has been fraud, mistake, or undue influence.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0