메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제38권 제1호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
209 - 228 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
That there is the principle of individual contract priority in Regulation of Standardized Contracts Actis why individual contract between business operator and customer is closer than standardized contract inintent. According to the purpose of the Regulation of Standardized Contracts Act, in case standardizedcontract is equal to individual contract, it apply to the Regulation of Standardized Contracts Act. Ifcumstomer doesn’t excises influence over the process of contract formation, - doesn’t have modifiability ofcontract. For this case is that customer is allowed to choose just contract content that is suggested bybusiness operator, related clause is not individual contract but standardized contract. To revise existing comercial transaction custom, When Fair Trade Commission(hereinafter, FTC)remedies standardized contract that correspond with existing comercial transaction custom, the standard ofabstract norm control and concrete norm control is different each other because a concrete range ofapplication and difference in point of view. Finally, Because somebody should pay commission is on theon hand bank gets a profit, on the other cumtomer gets a profit, this case apply to liberty of contract. Therefore, optional clause is not unfair clause.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (45)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0